brendon1000

brendon1000

Lives in India India
Has a website at www.brendonshootspeople.com
Joined on Feb 7, 2009

Comments

Total: 2168, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

TN Args: Good to see the crop-MF sensors are competitive with the best of FF.

^^ Well its coming next year and its public news so camera companies can plan on releasing new models based on the new sensors.

You haven't bothered to comment on the fact that you are comparing a few years old so called crop medium format sensor to the latest FF sensors available in the market today

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 07:22 UTC
In reply to:

LiangMing: For $1699, you may get a full frame Canon 6D MK2.

Well he/she who is looking to buy from scratch can bloody well make up his/her own mind !

Do the person want IQ if so then 6D mk 2 is better. Does the person want a much lighter birding/wildlife setup then the G9 far out performs the 6D mk 2.

Does the person want lots of smaller high performing lenses then again the 6D mk 2 falls behind.

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 06:42 UTC
In reply to:

TN Args: Good to see the crop-MF sensors are competitive with the best of FF.

Yeah Sony has already announced new MF sensors with 100 MP in this so called crop MF format. This is a very old so called crop MF sensor now.

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2017 at 06:29 UTC
In reply to:

stevevelvia50: An interesting article on m4/3 Olympus EM 1 verses the Nikon D 810 prints. Without high res mode.

http://www.thewanderinglensman.com/2014/02/the-practical-difference-between-full.html

^^ Yeah seriously I thought there were very small differences between sensor formats until I actually had both APS-C and FF. I would never want to shoot APS-C again. A bigger sensor is usually just better. Of course other aspects of m43 are really great like size and portability. However if you want the best IQ you simply have to ignore m43 since you simply aren't going to be able to beat APS-C forget about FF.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2017 at 09:05 UTC
In reply to:

rockchalker: I want to thank all of the anti-m43 people on this thread who have posted substanceless complaints about sensor size. You have done nothing but generate interest in this camera and the m43 format.

Everyone knows there is no image quality difference between m43 and APS-C formats. There are minor differences if you shoot at a ridiculously high ISO. You can verify this using the dpreview image comparison tool.

So, again, thank you for your efforts in promoting the m43 format.

Lol 'Everyone know there is no image quality difference between m43 and APS-C' !

There is but if you can't tell the difference then good for you be happy with what you have.

I know a few people who had both. All of them sold off their m43 gear. Only one friend has stuck with m43 for years now but he mostly shoots his lunch and dinner and shares to instagram.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2017 at 09:02 UTC
In reply to:

LiangMing: For $1699, you may get a full frame Canon 6D MK2.

Oh my God please stop these lunatic posts. This camera has a m43 mount and is more meant for people who have m43 gear. Sure you can buy a 6D mk 2 but can you attach any m43 lenses to it ? Well the answer is no you can't so stop with these idiotic posts.

And a 6D mk 2 can't compete with the features available on this cameras. If the fast fps, 4k video and other features aren't useful to you then this camera isn't targeted for you.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2017 at 08:59 UTC
In reply to:

junk1: Can the sensor be slowly shifted to track stars? I think at least one camera has that feature???

Dpreview covered the pentax pixel shift long back with multiple articles. However fanbois don't seem happy dpreview found fault with the AF tracking test of the Pentax. Same thing happened when dpreview faulted the A99 II tracking tests.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 11:04 UTC
In reply to:

Pooya Rastin: The camera saves individual files separately. So for those who complain about artefacts: you can add the individual file as a new layer on top of th pixel-shifted image and by masking fix those artefacts.

Most of the complainers don't seem to be people who care about IQ. Those who want max IQ and have a scene that can take advantage of this feature need to work a bit to get max results.

Of course with the 0.5 second delay between shots means the use of this is limited to what you can shoot for sure it's not completely useless as so many whiners are saying.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 11:01 UTC
In reply to:

eazizisaid: @dprstaff, my Sony A7 resolve better details in the studio comparison... I think you should redo the test with the 55 1.8

Or use the Sony 85mm f1.4 GM at least if they want to stick with only 85mm lenses.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 10:56 UTC
In reply to:

jwasturias: I added the Sigma SD Quattro H to the above comparison tool.
If you look at the last line in that newspaper section, it is also clearly readable. Without rainbow color scattering in the B&W text.
Better than my a7r :( and also better than the a7rii and K1 in non-pixel shift. The picture is smaller but sharper. I have never used a sigma camera but on the face of it, it looks like a great landscape camera.

Sigma foveon cameras where always great in terms of low iso IQ. However usability was generally horrible. They are very painful cameras to use but you do gain improvements to IQ that Bayer sensors cameras lack.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 10:54 UTC
In reply to:

aris14: To my opinion K-1 does it better overall.
And in less than 2/3 of the cost.

K1 was the pioneer in this and while I don't think it does it better you can't deny that the K1 is at least equal to this camera for a lot less.

However of course you get a far better rounded camera with the A7rIII with far better AF, video and lens support.

And better support too since Pentax is the only camera manufacturer that isn't available in my country at all.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 10:52 UTC
In reply to:

russbarnes: You say 'landscapes' but of course we already know this is useless for landscapes and the idea of using this feature for such subjects has already been wildly debunked. You subject has to be COMPLETELY static and there isn't a true landscape where that is likely to apply.

While this isn't something I will use a lot it can be useful in certain situations for sure. And for advanced users the 4 RAW files are all available so those who know what to do can clone out any artifacts and get a sharper photo than whats currently possible today.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 07:51 UTC
In reply to:

junk1: Can the sensor be slowly shifted to track stars? I think at least one camera has that feature???

^^ I would wager it has the star eater syndrome. Sony seem to be very reluctant to do a small fix that wouldn't take much effort at all since my A7rII didn't have the star eater syndrome till 2 patches back.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2017 at 06:14 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 first impressions (411 comments in total)
In reply to:

goblin: A deliberate closure of what was supposed to be an open system:

- Olympus announces pro lenses that mirror Panasonic's existing offers (at least for the 45mm f:1.2)

- Panasonic coughs up a whole fully blown alter ego to the Oly OM-D E-M1mk2, just for the sake of giving owners of Panasonic lenses drooling over Oly's dual image stabilization a Panny body to attach their lenses to (as Dual IS works only within the same brand - Oly lens + Oly body or Panny lens + Panny body).

- Owners of the legacy (rare but excellent) Panaleica 4/3 lenses have only Olympus (E-M1 & E-M1ii)'s shoulder to cry on if they want decent AF performance with their lenses via adapter. Owners of other (read: Zuiko) 4/3 lenses are, of course, set to stay with the E-M1 (& E-M1ii) because Panny would implement anything short of Depth From Moon Craters AF, as long as it's not standard PDAF to handle legacy (and non Panasonic) lenses.

All of this instead of working on making both companies' dual IS cross compatible.

^^ You are comparing apples to oranges !

Panasonic and Olympus jointly launched the m43 system and many expected that both would collaborate to grow the system as 2 heads are better than one.

However sadly its not the case and they are both behaving like hard core competitors. No one expects NIkon and Canon to join hands anytime soon but people expected Panasonic and Olympus to compete less with each other and instead concentrate on really improving the m43 ecosystem.

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2017 at 18:41 UTC
On article Sigma's new 16mm F1.4 will cost $450, ships this month (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

Woodyz: To me, the Zeiss 24mm 1.8 is the only E-mount lens worth getting. Otherwise, I wouldn't waste money buying crop lenses when it could go into full-frame FE lenses instead.

^^ No I think he meant the Sony Zeiss 24mm f1.8 that was launched eons ago.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/818647-REG/Sony_SEL24F18Z_SEL24F18Z_24_mm_f_1_8.html

Link | Posted on Nov 9, 2017 at 18:32 UTC
In reply to:

yslee1: Oh wow! The lens I've been asking Panasonic to make in like forever!

*sees price* Dammit! Not at that price though!

Edit: Why is it so heavy? A 200/2.8 from everyone else is a sub-kilo lens!

@Edgar_in_Indy - The K7 was tested on an older K7 14.2 MP DSLR and wide open its results were not the best. I would wager this lens will be sharper wide open since its a far newer optic than the decades old Pentax 200mm f2.8.

Of course the lens is still overpriced I feel but the AF and IS should be far better on a Panasonic body than the Pentax on a Pentax body.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 15:42 UTC
In reply to:

eddie_cam: For 3000 bucks I would rather buy a Sony RX10 IV and have 1000 bucks left, and even that price for the Sony is steep. Granted, it's not quite the same but at least you would get your money's worth even with that expensive Sony.

How are the two even comparable ? The Sony is s decent camera but its a super zoom and at the long end IQ suffers. This is a prime lens and should be optically far far superior.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 14:13 UTC
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: It should be forbidden to make any larger camera than Gx80 body for M43 makers. Body/sensor size ratio is ridiculous.

Why paying big, carrying bigger and have a small sensor ? This is the segment that we see small and capable cameras as GM1, GM5, GX80... what the joke is this !

FF user here and agree with what others are saying. My A7 body is so small and light weight but the moment you put on good glass and that small body doesn't seem like a big plus point anymore.

I tried out my friends GH5 which is bigger than my A7 but the lenses were much smaller and more easy to use. It was more preferable to use the GH5 than my A7.

Of course IQ was a differentiating factor but everything has its pros and cons and I find m43 has a very good niche these days.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 14:04 UTC
In reply to:

Edmond Leung: Looks like a very nice lens.
But once again.... it is really big and heavy.
Can you talk with Leica if they can improve these two issues?

^^ All those lenses were launched in the previous millennium. Attached to today's 50MP sensors they will start to show off their flaws. They are old outdated designs and while they are reasonably sharp contrast they can't compete with todays modern lenses.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 13:59 UTC
In reply to:

yslee1: Oh wow! The lens I've been asking Panasonic to make in like forever!

*sees price* Dammit! Not at that price though!

Edit: Why is it so heavy? A 200/2.8 from everyone else is a sub-kilo lens!

Most of the other manufacturers have very old 200mm optical designs. Newer ones have to work with high resolution sensors and have much greater contrast so they have to have many more elements to work with.

To give you a comparison, this lens has 15 elements in 13 groups while the Canon 200mm f2.8 II launched in March 1996 has just 9 elements in 7 groups.

So this should be a very sharp lens.

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 13:56 UTC
Total: 2168, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »