MattiD80

24mm is the best, 35mm is quite close, 50mm takes a little drop, 70mm recovers a tiny bit, but worse then 35mm. I would say 24-35mm for all day use hard to see diff with a prime. The 40-70mm you ...

It is a bit stiff, but not to much so. I like the precision i can get with it's zooming. I have never used 24-70mmG in past. the 14-24mm and 24-120mm F have less stiffness. Personally i find the ...

You love to shoot landscape? Don't return it. Period. You mostly love to shoot portait? Get the G version. You want light weight? only primes dill do this, for you or 24-120mm but it is not up to ...

I own both. Both are amazing. I had 20mm, 24mm and 35mm art on travel. I used 20mm most, and 35mm second most. 24mm was used only via my 24-70mm VR (when zooming was more required for getting the ...

I have been drooling/wanting the FL F2.8E (70-200mm) badly. But recent using of my 70-200mm F4 (especially since i recently upgrade from d800 to d810), has me perplexed. It's my sharpest zoom ...

I see field curvature in most pictures. Has nothing to do with softness of lens. UWA no matter what has to introduce at at least one focal length heavy field curvature. no way around it. The focus ...

Probably to far from your case (not same lens or Camera/brand) but my sigma 35mm art on D810 liveviews without hickup or accuracy problems (perfect thus).

My 70-200mm F4 is flawless in real life. I probably could AF-test it like my sigma 35mm, but meh. It's so good on D810, that i'm like why. This lens keeps surprising me in sharpness, VR efficiency ...

I know some ppl disagree, but i would say the Sigma art 135mm is the sharpnest. Especially wide open (unique F1.8 aperture) and in corners. Just look at photozone. Almost no lens touches the ...

Perhaps nikon 70-200mm FL ED. From what i see, it's crazy sharp, with no 'old' or 'dark' (F4+) lens coming close to it's sharpness. I think this zoomlens atm is only surpassed by exotic primes ...

You should mention wich system you use. If you mean Tamron 28-70 vs Sigma 35mm for Sony i would go for Sigma.

While it's certainly nice to have more magnification, as many ppl here posted, close focus distance is weakness of the VR version of the lens. 0,5 meter is most of time quite bad, (i got one ...

Glad you like it. I used it again on a trip i just came back from, and it's simply the best allround tool in my bag. For landscape images it comes 85-90% close to the primes in F8 setting ...

I got my tamron back now (wich had the issue). They repaired it (under warranty). They also updated firmware (secret version? There is noone with tap in console). So my guess is the focus ...

I ordered Dxo Photolab and viewpoint in december when it was on discount for 200 euro (rather then 298). I love it now. I miss some features out of lightroom/photoshop but not many (who will...

Welcome guys :) I enjoyed your video reviews. Good mixture of tech and practical experience of camera's (and enough jokes to keep us interested) :)

From my experience, and my own theory: The OS has to move, on a heavy long lens (like 150-600), the focal length magnifies any shake. Because of that just moving 'what you shaked' is not enough ...

Default = most agressive (but least stable viewfinder). Most amount of stops gained. Dynamic view: a mix between next one and earlier one. More stable viewfinder, slighly less efficient. Moderate ...

28mm* not 24mm :D If it was 24mm i would be all onto it (buying it). 24mm is my most used focal length, a top of the line lens there would be epic, 28mm is already to much crop for me judging from ...

You can adjust at 4 different distance for one focal length (prime) and at 4 focal lenths (for zoom). I 4 years did NOT callibrate Sigma, now i did. +7 -2 +0 +1 are the values. Trust me in BODY ...