MattiD80

While i am impressed, i'm not surprised, and neither blown away. I think i'll hold onto my 24-70mm F2.8E for a lot longer, on my d810 (this combo has of all my lenses the highest focus accuracy of ...

If you just spam the shutter (wich is what op mostly did with high fps shooting), then you can get good amount of shots out of any camera. I think i would get 3k out of D810. It's when you ...

If XQD (or CFexpress) is the future, Canon would have used it already, it hasn't. Even if technologically the mentioned memory is the best, for a long while there will be no price competition on ...

i can see why XQD card is good for some but not for me. Buffer is insanely more important (with a cheap memory card), then an expensive memory card with low buffer. I had only ever one SD card ...

I'm curious how it will compare universally: Milvus 25mm, Nikon 28mm F1.4E, Sigma 24/35mm (i hope better then both), Otus, Sony 24mm seems like it might become the top 24mm dog (my favo focal ...

I've been looking at these mtf and they are a bit to good to be true imo. My feeling for the primes: They will be better then the F1.8G counterparts. They will have quite even sharpness but not ...

Yes they should share it. For instance F mount has tons of lenses, but no good (wich means truly landscape sharp for me) 50mm lens. Sigma has that and at a lovely price point. Sigma not only ...

If flange distance + large mount diameter was the holy grail more camera makers would have already used it. I'm convinced the advantages (apart for UWA lens size) are overblown. Canon renewed ...

Yes, you can't choose both. Afterward you can try to inbody tune the other body a bit so correlates a bit more.

What I notice most is that at F1.4 Infinity the sigma is insanely sharp (cameralabs.com d850 full res). It does better wide open then many lenses at F5,6. The nikkor does worse on that site, but ...

Tamron is super cheap in Belgium atm. (was about 839 euro at launch, i got mine in a one time, one supply deal for 719 euro, Sigma's been permanent at 849 euro). Atm you can get the Tamron for 779 ...

Or a 24mm F1.4E, i would so much buy that. Seems like milvus is only choice atm, and not sure if i want it, expensive no autofocus, not sure how much better then my 24mm F1.4. No travel size (old ...

In Belgium Tamron is cheaper then Sigma due to an promotion (sigma has not been discounted much yet). https://www.kamera-express.be/product/12239183/tamron-100-400mm-f-4-5-6-3-di-vc-usd-nikon/?gcli ...

24mm is the best, 35mm is quite close, 50mm takes a little drop, 70mm recovers a tiny bit, but worse then 35mm. I would say 24-35mm for all day use hard to see diff with a prime. The 40-70mm you ...

It is a bit stiff, but not to much so. I like the precision i can get with it's zooming. I have never used 24-70mmG in past. the 14-24mm and 24-120mm F have less stiffness. Personally i find the ...

You love to shoot landscape? Don't return it. Period. You mostly love to shoot portait? Get the G version. You want light weight? only primes dill do this, for you or 24-120mm but it is not up to ...

I own both. Both are amazing. I had 20mm, 24mm and 35mm art on travel. I used 20mm most, and 35mm second most. 24mm was used only via my 24-70mm VR (when zooming was more required for getting the ...

I have been drooling/wanting the FL F2.8E (70-200mm) badly. But recent using of my 70-200mm F4 (especially since i recently upgrade from d800 to d810), has me perplexed. It's my sharpest zoom ...

I see field curvature in most pictures. Has nothing to do with softness of lens. UWA no matter what has to introduce at at least one focal length heavy field curvature. no way around it. The focus ...

Probably to far from your case (not same lens or Camera/brand) but my sigma 35mm art on D810 liveviews without hickup or accuracy problems (perfect thus).