kevin camera

Joined on Feb 3, 2012


Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9
In reply to:

Nikita66: Every Samsung product I have ever used has had stupidly illogical UI. That plus mediocre quality and their blatant rip off of other companies (Apple of course) is enough to never come near one of their products. Have some integrity, look elsewhere.

i guess this camera phone was a straight rip-off from apple, just like the galaxy note :D

Link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 03:46 UTC

as a handicap, he should take pictures of other fellow athletes behind him using the D4 during his olympic sprints

Link | Posted on Aug 11, 2012 at 21:35 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply
On article First Impressions: Using the Fujifilm X-Pro1 (228 comments in total)

this is a really excellent camera for those with any doubts.

i went on vacation so decided to buy it now, with some corporate discount, instead of waiting for the price to drop (and my suspicion is the price will drop... this is hardly an affordable camera given the stock levels)

yes, AF is slow... but it is the image quality that stands out

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2012 at 23:13 UTC as 36th comment

oh wow. this is a sensor problem now? it's good that fuji is hinting that there will be a recall. i'm more confident in buying the xpro 1 now...

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2012 at 00:39 UTC as 70th comment

that's really good. i thought you would only be able to buy a couple of sigma pens and coffee cups with 40 points.

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2012 at 04:07 UTC as 47th comment
On article First impressions shooting with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

Markoe Photoe: Why couldn't we pick our cameras based only a photo of the final output that the camera produced? The cost would also be listed next to the print to justify the cost to get to that level of quality.

Not sure why we have to discuss models hair, her eyelashes, camera hood slightly crooked...who really cares about this?

When you're out shooting with this camera, or other cameras, do people think about this mindless chatter?

it is your personal opinion that there are only two measurable qualities in a camera -- the picture quality and price

there's the experience while taking a picture (leica MF lenses vs AF in P&S), size of camera (dslr vs mirrorless), convenience of sharing pictures (smartphone vs real camera), which cannot be easily measured in your system.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2012 at 01:54 UTC

facebook does not excel in picture quality, but it has the ability to present it to all your friends.

it's kind of like asking the question... if a tree fell and no one heard it. did it make a sound?

similarly, if a picture was taken but nobody viewed it, was the moment really captured?

Link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 23:56 UTC as 49th comment

hey dpreview, please do a review on the xpro-1 soon :)... it's expensive, but i'm hoping that the price will go down as more companies enter the high-end mirrorless market.

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2012 at 22:05 UTC as 25th comment

it's too bad that the price is not "mainstream" for this walk-around camera (i'm making this assumption because of the 18mm and 35mm lenses).

mind you a nex-7 + carl zeiss 24mm f1.8 will cost around the same price...

it's probably wrong to compare these cameras to a gf2, but gf2 kit costs about $300 and it's pretty good for a walkaround camera :)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 18:29 UTC as 54th comment | 1 reply
Total: 9, showing: 1 – 9