tkbslc

Lives in United States Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Joined on May 30, 2008

Comments

Total: 4658, showing: 1061 – 1080
« First‹ Previous5253545556Next ›Last »
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

caver3d: No thanks. I'll just have to carry on with my meager Sony A7RII. Or maybe I can stick a Hasselblad label over my lookalike Pentax K-01. Pentax, you're ahead of your time.

Here's hoping it comes in mustard yellow like the Pentax.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:29 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

jaygeephoto: I always hoped that my old Mamiya 7 would be reincarnated some day as a digital camera. Nice!

1.7x crop factor from 6x7 though. Might as well drop all the way to 2.1x crop and get an A7.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:28 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

Conrad567: 1/2000 flash sync, would make using lenses wide open out doors a possibility. Anything faster than f3.5 would seem a waste in bright sunlight. I really think this was designed with wedding photographers in mind.

Is 70mm equivalent long enough for a wedding?

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:26 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedMangrove: I wish someone would be a game changer in naming cameras. How many X's, 1's, and D's do we need?

Since maybe 3 film cameras have been made in the past decade, I keep wondering why cameras still often have the "D for digital" naming.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:25 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

ogl: The camera is Interesting to discuss, but the camera is useless for 99.9999% of users. :)

I think you'd take a few 9's off for the Nikon D7200. It's useless for only 99.9%.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:24 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)

Is this really medium format? The frame size is 44x33mm. Common medium format film sizes are 60x45mm, 60x60mm and 60x70mm. Compared to those, this sensor has about a 1.4, 1.5 or 1.7x crop factor (based on the diagonal).

This is like APS-C Medium format and only a 1.27x larger diagonal than FF digital.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 16:09 UTC as 178th comment | 7 replies
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

OSDphoto: So what is the game and how did this change it?

Who is paying $25,000 for a Leica M body?

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:52 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: Where are the 700 posts complaining that the lenses are only f2.8 and f3.5 equivalent?

Here's my math: 55mm diagonal vs 43.2mm diagonal is a .79x crop factor. f3.5x0.79 = 2.75 and f4.5 x 0.79 = 3.54

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:48 UTC
On article Plugin allows direct Instagram posting from Lightroom (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: I always thought most of the fun of Instagram was seeing what people could do with smartphone cameras. Posting from high end cameras kind of spoils the charm. Not that people haven't been doing it for a while, it is just that once the balance shifts too far, it might as well be flickr.

I don't think that is weird, but Instagram is an odd choice for quality image sharing due to the image and viewing size restrictions. Even when viewing from a PC, you can't seem to zoom in farther than a 1000x1000 pix square on your monitor.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:43 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)
In reply to:

eya1: Pricing is not much more than pro Canikon bodies and lenses but IQ is probably through the roof . Will this be a mirrorless game-changer? It will be interesting to see the long-term effect this technology has on the camera industry as a whole.

All I need is a whole lot of money; a whole lot of processing power and, a whole lotta Rosie!!!

It's only 1.27x larger. I wouldn't expect miracles.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:18 UTC
On article Medium-format mirrorless: Hasselblad unveils X1D (1179 comments in total)

Where are the 700 posts complaining that the lenses are only f2.8 and f3.5 equivalent?

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 15:16 UTC as 202nd comment | 4 replies
On article Plugin allows direct Instagram posting from Lightroom (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

JeremiahL: I'm actually shocked this hasn't existed up until now.

I haven't used LightRoom in a couple years, but back then there were plugins to process images and upload directly to Flickr and SmugMug from within LR. It really took this long to add Instagram?!?

It was supposed to be for mobile photographers. I think they are finally giving up, but I think the core user base is beginning to leave as a result.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 04:45 UTC
On article Plugin allows direct Instagram posting from Lightroom (49 comments in total)

I always thought most of the fun of Instagram was seeing what people could do with smartphone cameras. Posting from high end cameras kind of spoils the charm. Not that people haven't been doing it for a while, it is just that once the balance shifts too far, it might as well be flickr.

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2016 at 04:43 UTC as 10th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Jostian: Arrgghh!! iPhone 7 to have a Sony sensor... really hope they get the processing sorted this time round so we don't have the disappointment that is the 6S (which also uses a Sony sensor) in terms of IQ, massive NR and no detail....

Who isn't using a Sony sensor?

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 23:24 UTC
On article All about that lens: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III review (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

raindance: Great review, but honestly if you are in the market for this camera consider FF. I know this camera is about the lens, but seriously image quality is night and day with FF. You could pick up a FF body and a 50 1.8 to start for the same price point. I know apples and oranges, but just saying been there, done that and wish I would have made the FF switch sooner ;)

Then Average Joe wouldn't be looking at this camera.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 23:21 UTC
On article All about that lens: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III review (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: When it is eventually released, it will be interesting to see how the Nikon DL24-500 compares. It has "105-point phase detection AF" and "171-point contrast-detect AF". It also has a touchscreen.

Lens is a stop slower, too.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 20:54 UTC
On article All about that lens: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III review (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

villagranvicent: Excellent review, down-to-earth without the recent over the top claims and headlines, seems like a solid performer but at a hefty price. I would love to see a real life comparison vs the FZ1000 or even vs m43 systems considering the cost is in the same ball park to see if paying twice the money is worthy.

Zooming with my feet means that I have to take my shoes off to work the zoom lever with my toes. Very awkward.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 19:47 UTC
On article All about that lens: Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III review (476 comments in total)
In reply to:

raindance: Great review, but honestly if you are in the market for this camera consider FF. I know this camera is about the lens, but seriously image quality is night and day with FF. You could pick up a FF body and a 50 1.8 to start for the same price point. I know apples and oranges, but just saying been there, done that and wish I would have made the FF switch sooner ;)

Not even apples and oranges. More like comparing bicycles and pants.

Link | Posted on Jun 21, 2016 at 19:40 UTC
In reply to:

Emacs23: I have S7 and the camera is wonderful. But the phone itself is crap-crap-crap: still lagging (samsung veterans say it was even worse in previous models), full of low quality apps like facebook or skype. Cannot recommend it to anyone. Avoid samsung.

Some phones won't let you uninstall pre-bundled apps, sadly.

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 21:38 UTC
In reply to:

nyer82: A lot of this has to do with different release schedules, the iPhone 7 is much closer to being released than any Samsung Galaxy S8 (the S7 just came out for godsakes).

Without new camera technology, though, what is the point of an iphone 7?

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2016 at 20:12 UTC
Total: 4658, showing: 1061 – 1080
« First‹ Previous5253545556Next ›Last »