filmly

thanks dad. My mental shift was from neutral to amusement so don't see how that's a bad thing lol. Anyway signing out so I don't feel "curiousity" to reply to the lower vibe know it alls anytime soon.

I don't get Richard's attacking reply :S The OP has more than enough reason to say what he said. Nearly same price, not much difference in size yet stripped of features and performance. Saying that...

nah just signed up but I've been a 'logged out' user for years. I should probably log out to avoid this kind of confrontation though haha. There's definitely a bias in my eyes but I couldn't care...

yep! unless you want razor thin DOF (i personally dislike that) even a gopro shooting in raw mode will get you great image quality if you know what you're doing. So refreshing to see your comment ...

22 DPR staff comments on a review. Must be some defensive maneuvers going on hehe. I guess it is a Sony camera we're talking about.

Already has enough gravitational mass to hold all the loose rocks on.

I'm looking forward to the cheap used gear about to flood the market

"Military Grade"

love my GH5 :)

Nice one but you say $1500 in the title but $2988 in the body text? Glad you are supporting the economy either way :-)

With the rise in vlogging, OM would be wise to push hard in small body with powerful video features. Photos don't require much in terms of storage and processing power so smartphones will eat that ...

Nice, in a blind test it is hard to decipher between the two lenses in your examples. I own the 100-400 as well. The first thing I did with it was on a tripod, with a shutter delay at 400mm ISO ...