Loose_Canon

I tend to agree. However, the magnification in the viewfinder is somewhat of a problem for people that wear glasses. I can barely see the 50mm frame lines, and as for 35mm - forget it. A bit ...

looks underexposed to me.

I don't have too much experience, but I'll throw in my 2 bits anyway. My father had a Rollei 2.8, which I inherited, but didn't like so much. TLR's are large! I got a Bronica ETRS recently, with ...

Of course you do! No, you really don't. In fact, why not? You really shouldn't.

I'm wondering if this is a mamiya thing, or common to other medium format cameras. i recently bought a bronica etrs, which is also 645 format. i can't explain why. but i find a hard-to-explain ...

Welcome! I've been experimenting with film for the past two years. Not an expert, but I managed to get some insights: 1. underexposure is really bad.  I can't really say about over. 2. I try to ...

I just sold 2 shots on 500px for 3 cents each! No kidding. Now I'm a pro :-) Selling photographs is tough these days... the idea of having a gallery in your coffee shop is a very good one. ...

Get real. It's silly rants like this that give people who come up with silly rants a bad name. Digital is here to stay, and there's nothing wrong with that. 90% of the pros will never go back to ...

It certainly looks like film is here to stay, and of course digital isn't going anywhere either. It's nice to have choices. Frankly I still can't explain what attracted me back to film after about ...

Here's a desert inn, in T-Max 400, with an olympus OM-2S:

beautiful photos! what camera/lens/film?

Someone once mistook my film camera for a paperweight. I decided to forgive him.

wow! good job!