whumber

You probably never noticed it because it's not true. 500mm f/5.6 PF 300mm f/4 PF 400mm f/4 DO II

I doubt there's all that much programming involved at this point other than potentially building some infrastructure to allow users to swap subject libraries in and out. Most of the work will be ...

It's the same sensor as the 1DXiii.

No question, as exciting as this is my current Olympus gear feels pretty close to fully mature technology. As much as I love Canon ergonomics I'm not sure I can see myself buying into another ...

How do you figure that? The Rs have a more advanced AF system, higher burst speed, similar electronic readout speed, weather sealing, and if we believe Chris and Jordan's take even the IBIS is as ...

It's the difference between "slow" lenses being the exception to the rule vs all that's available.

You can effectively get 4K RAW by cropping out the middle of an 8K RAW video but otherwise I doubt it. By definition you're never going to get FF 4K RAW from a 45MP sensor.

The EVF panel in the R is already capable of updating at 120Hz, it's likely that the electronics are just not capable of driving it at that speed.

Or if you want a camera with a global shutter.

Yeah, aside from the leatherette on the front mechanically it's a pretty rock solid camera.

I don't believe the second part of that statement is a fair assessment of Lenstip. Out of all the reviewers doing lens testing, other than OLAF/LR, they do the best job trying to maintain some ...

This statement is pretty funny given that we know with reasonably high confidence that Sigma holds the patent for at least the Olympus 45 PRO.

I know it's not going to happen but if Olympus could bring this lens in at even ~$3K it would be pretty amazing. I'm still expecting something in the $6K range though.

The 318mm from Sony is correct, it's your scaling that's incorrect. Your image makes the Sony look larger than it is.

Your scaling of the Sony is incorrect. If we take the size of the 300 PRO in the comparison as 227mm then the Sony in your comparison comes out to 335mm rather than 318mm.

You mean like the studio scene comparison tool?

The Sigma 100-400 on an A7RIV is pretty close in both size and reach.

For a given volume a lens, as in the glass rather than the entire assembly, made of CaF2 will be something like half the weight.

Something like 310-320mm is what you get if you make some measurements from the available shots of the lens mounted on the E-M1X using the hotshoe as a known length. 318mm seems consistent with ...