Kaelis

Kaelis

Lives in France Paris, France
Has a website at http://www.alexispillon.com/
Joined on Jan 11, 2012

Comments

Total: 71, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

elee1967: Of course. Who need that thing, when - according to DPR forums - one can simply see 3D effect from a DSLR photo.

You can but only if the lens has less than 5 elements and was made before 1998 ;)

Link | Posted on Oct 12, 2017 at 07:25 UTC
On article Nikon D850 Review (1917 comments in total)
In reply to:

PropaPH: over one thousand comments and it's only been up for two hours.... is that a record?

It's because the comments are back from when they published the very first page of this "First Impression Review". They've been adding pages several times and the comments end up being a whole lot in the end.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 16:21 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the Canon PowerShot G1 (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bambi24: Can it shoot 4k?

@Bambi : Maybe people would leave you alone of you showed some of your work instead of spouting whining non-sense on every news. Can’t even be funny when you try either :/

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 16:45 UTC
In reply to:

melgross: Sounds like what the new iPhone 8 does for $699, which includes the entire phone and everything else that goes with it that this, for $500, doesn’t have.

Does this also shoot HDR 10 and in the 4K color DCI-P3 standard as the iPhone does?

@mandm

Get you facts straight before trolling attempts, the iPhone 8 can stay up to 30mn at 1m under water, meaning it gets the IP67 certification.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2017 at 15:44 UTC
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: I miss those resolution number charts that compared lines per picture height. It was really useful. Does anyone know why that was discontinued?

I guess because they show the lens performance as much as the sensor's one, and you can't compare different lenses or adapt them easily on all mount. Not to mention the crop factors too between different sensors.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2017 at 15:30 UTC
In reply to:

Bambi24: How do you do exposure compensation without a single dial on this thing?

Where is the mode dial?

Do you have to use live view for everything? That could be pretty bad if the sunlight is blasting on the screen and you can't see a thing.

Remembering your D850 comments I was under the impression that you absolutely loved live-view :D

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2017 at 10:38 UTC
In reply to:

mick232: Pathetic attempt of being funny.

Pathetic attempt at commenting 😬

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2017 at 15:03 UTC
On article Nikon D850: First full-res sample images (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

heavymeister: Look at the detail of the blackheads on the model's nose. Nice.

"blur filters" OK thanks Bambi to proving that you know nothing about serious photography. Keep commenting about the D850 LV AF please, at least you're entertaining in that, but don't try serious stuff you might harm yourself.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2017 at 07:46 UTC
In reply to:

Bambi24: incredible lack of detail and oversharpened halos everywhere

Your comments are as limited as Canon DR, nothing new under the sun :D

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2017 at 07:41 UTC
In reply to:

Bambi24: incredible lack of detail and oversharpened halos everywhere

And I find it very funny that the only feature you crave for in a camera as expensive as this one is the freaking live-view autofocus speed. Stay with your "Rebel" toys or with your smartphone even since you don't want to share your awesome eye with the world but prefer to share your pitiful and insightless comments all over.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2017 at 07:38 UTC
In reply to:

Bambi24: incredible lack of detail and oversharpened halos everywhere

"I didn't say anything about the pictures it takes".... hmmmm what about your first comment into this very thread for instance ? You're a depressive contributor to this website, pulling down a perfect camera just because you can't buy it and you chose the Canon wreck train over it. You should try photography you know, you can make 1k a day, when you're talented that is, something I doubt you know apart from the trolling realm.

As said everywhere else people don't spend 3.300 dollars on a camera only to shoot video in AF like teens on smartphone. This is a tool of precision and anyone serious working in the video industry will be better off using manual focus for smooth and silent focus gradations. And then you have power-focus tools that have nothing to do with the LV either.

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2017 at 07:37 UTC
On article Nikon D850: First full-res sample images (362 comments in total)
In reply to:

dmiley: Does anyone besides me think that six news items on the Nikon D850 plus a Nikon D700 retrospective in the last 17 hours is excessive?

Was the same for the a9 so not a problem.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 21:50 UTC
In reply to:

DualSystemGuy: Now this is how you announce a camera, holy cow. Canon might need to lower some prices...

Autofocus in video are for babies so who cares. Your smartphone will still be able to capture effortlessly your cat yawning or what you ate for breakfast.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 08:50 UTC
In reply to:

TN Args: Surface problems are all superficial. Apple problems go to the core.

Being the first company likely to hit 1 billion in stock worth is hardly a problem but ok.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 21:46 UTC
On article Throwback Thursday: the iPhone 4S (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ergo607: My heart aches if I read this sentence: "Of course the Sony RX100 came out the following summer and, '...) the $650 MSRP was a sign that dedicated photography tools capable of truly better output than a phone were going to be pushing ever further up-market."

Really? A $650 camera is expensive, but a $800 iPhone is about the right price? To each their own I guess...

Point being you don't buy a phone ONLY to take pictures..

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 13:50 UTC
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review (1117 comments in total)
In reply to:

KubeKube: The score should reflect the overall conclusion of the pros and cons of a given camera. This doesn't seem to be the case here. For example, back in 2014 DPR awarded the same, 80 percent score to Sony A6000 recognizing the camera's novelty and excellent overall quality. Giving the same score to a camera which even the reviewers admit falls short compared to most of its peers and even compared to crop-sensor models indicates a positive bias toward Canon or lack of consistency when calculating score. At this price ($1,999) 6D II should be recognized for what it is - a technological and marketing failure on the part of Canon.

The lack of any kind of award is saying plenty don't worry.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 15:28 UTC
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review (1117 comments in total)

I hope people will stop saying you're sold to Canon, Nikon, Sony or whatever when they see this honest review.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 15:25 UTC as 242nd comment | 6 replies
On article Canon EOS 6D Mark II Review (1117 comments in total)
In reply to:

CheersUK: Somebody screwed the formatting up. The Conclusion page is Page 4.

@avicenw

As we say on Reddit : savage !

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 15:15 UTC
In reply to:

PhotoKhan: Question: Will there ever be an article written about Apple where the writer does not feel compelled to include some kind of superlative in the title?

Don't need more phones when it's the best available.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2017 at 20:54 UTC
In reply to:

Sdaniella: a great way to commemorate 2017 Apple's iphone sales falling well behind Samsung's Galaxy ...

meanwhile ... next apple iphone to get gazillions of AMOLED displays from Samsung

while both Samsung and Apple continue to get gazillion SONY sensors for their smartphones ...

(almost) everyone is happy ...

They sell less than Samsung but they make way more on each phone, they have something like 70% of the smartphone market revenue.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2017 at 20:53 UTC
Total: 71, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »