Joined on Jan 13, 2012


Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

I can respect Leica’s hustle but this camera came out in 2018…

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2023 at 02:30 UTC as 37th comment

Rather then rehashing a 4 year old camera in limited edition colorways, Ricoh should focus its efforts on producing a full frame GR21 with the same form factor as the original film camera.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2023 at 14:54 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies


Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2022 at 09:20 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

Ebeay: So... if the F in FX does not stand for FullFrame, what does it stand for?

That’s Nikon

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2022 at 20:43 UTC


Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2022 at 03:37 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply

Isn’t the M10 already obsolete? Given that these cameras will never be taken out of the box why not make collector’s editions of film cameras instead of digital?

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2022 at 17:07 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

snapa: When you said "The light from Earendel took 12.8 billion years to reach Hubble" what does that have to do with the cost of food, energy, or anything else that matters to people on earth right now?

How will that image help humanity in any way? I don't see any relevence to anything important myself. Please help my understand why this image is important in any way.

Aslo, if it took 12.8 billion years to reach Hubble, it has probably change significantly today, just saying. I guess its nice to see what something looked a very long time ago? :/

The same can be said about many other aspects of our way of life and shouldn’t be taken for granted. The Hubble space telescope was launched In 1990 and it is still working so why not use it?

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2022 at 13:51 UTC
In reply to:

Biowizard: Wow! A *REAL* lens at last - just glass and metal. Like they used to be. No firmware. No electronics to fry. LOVE IT!

How many cameras have failed on you because of faulty electronics?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2022 at 00:32 UTC

How about a micro four thirds sensor in a RX100?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2021 at 04:24 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Photato: -SD slot 3X *slower* than UHS-II
-Not the newer WiFi 6E.

Give Apple 5 more years and they might think about it.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2021 at 17:36 UTC

The fact that this is an affordable parfocal lens is awesome.

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2021 at 00:17 UTC as 20th comment
On article Apple iPhone 13 Pro sample gallery (461 comments in total)

Guys, give the camera on your phone a break. You have to admit that it’s not bad at all for what it is and it’s always there for you when you want to take a quick snapshot.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2021 at 18:12 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

GOVA: I do own the 1D, I still take pictures with it. I have 20x30 posters with pics from that body.

The IQ is outstanding. The CCD provides colors hard to match. The sensor has been extraordinary.

Yes, its 800+ ISO can't compare to today's bodies, blah, blah...
Its LCD is terrible, I keep it off. It has NO VIDEO, thanks Lord.
The batteries are clunky, but okay. It has been a beast and total winner 20 years ago and now.

And, yes, I have the original 1Ds too.

I also own the original 1Ds, and dare I say that the JPG that it produces are perfect it every way.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2021 at 18:38 UTC

Summicron? Ok

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2021 at 16:28 UTC as 40th comment
In reply to:

Steve in GA: The really amazing thing is that NASA could even find a camera that would operate on the moon.

Google says that temperatures on the moon can range from 260 degrees Fahrenheit to a low of minus 280 degrees Fahrenheit. Do you think your Sony, Nikon or Canon could handle that?

Maybe they never went to the moon?

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2021 at 17:25 UTC

Everyone, Relax! It’s just for FUN!

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2021 at 18:08 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

Marty4650: How will Fjorden guarantee that this expensive add on device will be compatible with future iPhones? Are they partnering with Apple, or do they have some inside information about their future plans?

The iPhone has changed size, shape, thickness, and even connectivity ports many times in the past. How will they prevent Apple from changing them in the future?

Nothing last fjorever

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2021 at 07:49 UTC
In reply to:

GarysInSoCal: What's the holdup? The REAL holdup takes place when ignorant patsies buy ANYTHING from Apple. Yeah I see all the yuppies with more money than brains standing in the 'my I-Phone needs constant service' lengthy lines at the red fruity store. I have a hard time containing my laughter... :D

Not all apples are red.

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2021 at 12:46 UTC

So, we’ll see this in an iPhone in about 5 years after Samsung puts one out.

Link | Posted on Jul 14, 2021 at 21:38 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with the new Panasonic Leica 25-50mm F1.7 ASPH (391 comments in total)

Bokeh is overrated

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2021 at 19:20 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »