camerosity

Same. I don't miss the 24-70 f4 at all vs. my 24-200mm f4-6.3. Especially like that the 24-200mm is always ready to shoot, no need to move it out of 'Park' to a focal length number to take a ...

If you really need eye af buy the Canon. Hope this helps.

Yes, the 14-30mm has the Park feature too. So to use the lens you have to "un-park" it to at least the minimum focal length. That doesn't work for my brain, I like to walk around and not have the ...

24-200mm f4-6.3 is amazing. First "super zoom" I ever owned. 200mm at f6.3 is superb. Got this with my Z6ii during a Nikon promotion. The normal Z6ii bundle came with the 24-70mm f4, which I owned ...

That's why I sold my J5. I need glasses for far away vision so I was constantly having to remove my glasses to shoot a photo then put them on again. Keeping the V1 and V3 (for now, though I like ...

+1

I find the V3 a big drop in image quality from the J5, even at base ISO 160, the V3 is pretty ugly, unless you only shoot JPGs and are happy with those. I shoot NEF and process in Photoshop and ...

Loved the D700 as an upgrade from my D300, but always hated the ~92% viewfinder coverage. I crop in-camera so having artifacts show up in the final image (especially on the right side) that were ...

Already have the 35mm f1.8S so I have no need for a compact 40mm f2, but would be interested in a compact 24mm f2.

Overall I prefer the 56mm focal length over the 77mm for my photography so the 12 Pro will stay with me for a while it seems.

I experience no lag in the viewfinder of my Z6ii...what it presents to my eye is "live" and I shoot based on that. I really don't feel any difference between that and an optical viewfinder, and I ...

Yes! The black version definitely plan to grab one while I wait for the 35mm f1.2 S to appear on the market.

No evidence of any new Nikon lens releases on the Viltrox website...https://viltroxstore.com/collections/camera-lens/z-mount

Some limitations you haven't experienced yourself but "read about on the internet?" What? Your entire post is nonsense.

I'd say the Df is a superb camera with somewhat limited 16MP resolution. I prefer 24MP for my every day photography but the Df certainly stands alone among all the Nikon digital bodies produced. ...

I used to shoot with primes back in the day. Then got the Nikon 28-105mm EDIF zoom and it was great for travel. Then the 24-85mm VR and finally the 24-105mm f4 VR and now the Nikon 24-200mm Z lens. ...

Hmmm. You can't see LIVE as in what the camera is presenting to you as LIVE on the EVF? Not sure what you mean. I've shot hockey with my Z50 and the FTZ with my Nikon 70-300mm AF-P and it works ...

I couldn't disagree with your comment more... Nikon made the Z mount camera system to improve their cameras and lenses. Full stop. It had nothing to do with the failure of the F mount at all. The F ...

I don't see it that way at all. I was not "forced" by anyone to move in to the Z system. You sound suspiciously like another forum member who vehemently hates the "Zee" system as he calls it. And ...

I met a pro wedding photographer who shoots with the D780 with a D750 as his backup. He seems to like it. I think the D750 has a long shadow because it was so successful that many didn't think the ...