 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Old Mate by old shutter bugger from People Photography 2022 | Anna's Hummingbird-5575 by vbuhay from Color me Wild - Shades of Green | Date by CarlosU from I get a Long | under construction by hozho from Under Construction | Pileated Woodpecker in Flight by Fotorequest from A Big Year - Birds 2022 | Bursting with Joy by TaoVerit from Montage |
Ugh, battery grip - rather have better batteries
HowaboutRAW: gandul:
There are less expensive still cameras with APSC sensors and excellent lenses, get one of those, say a Samsung NX300 and then you can also get a video camera.
Hmm yabokkie. He's like a dog on your trouser leg. I say 'he' because no woman would post such moronic comments.
jennyrae: camera look very nice. want to know what it can do else.
can mek cup tee
you are Indiana Jones and I claim my five pounds
RedFox88: This is a camera trying to fix something that isn't broken. We don't need dials for these settings as they are better and faster controlled in other ways. This must be the camera for the mid-life crisis men in their 50s and 60s even 70s who want to try to "re-claim" their youth... and pay for it!
Oh get over your age problem RichardCranium88. Plenty of talentless hipsters out there are buying into retro you know.
Didnt they make Ken Rockwell's watch? Count me in!'
Hatred in art is a sign of good health; indifference is death.
Nah, bought into this system for the pleasure of using a lightweight camera, quality primes and no zooms or !@#$%^&* 'mode' dials. Choice! Phew!
aaaaaaawesome!!!!!
Stinky, very stinky going forward
CameraLabTester: The company should put out a CONTEST with great prizes with the theme:
Best 5 uses of the Lytro Camera:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.
No, these are the RESULTS of that contest
I'm getting one because they're made in Krasnogorsk
That original Billy the Kid plate has some serious historical value, having been just a few feet from the Kid himself when it was made.
down boy!
This
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brr4YVyNoFc
Piciul: Photoshop should have fraction from current buyers. Hobbyists and enthusiasts need PS like they need a sewing machine for mending stockings.
Unless you are creating covers for magazines, there are terrestrial options for adjusting your photos (e.g. Acdsee pro)
If you really need it, you'll take a deep breath and pay for it.
billybones1918: I say good riddance to expensive upgrades. Let designers fork out for Adobe products; there are more efficient alternatives for photographers.
There are plenty of commercial photographers using C1 for their entire workflow. There are plenty of amateurs who will never need more functions than Aperture. Of course PS is wonderful and the rest of it. So what?
Adam Filipowicz: I bet most of the people that are complaining about paying a small fee to use photoshop, dont own a license and have a pirated copy.. becasue if your complaing about $20 then whats the likelyhood you bought it for $1000
Please don't judge others by your own standards
I say good riddance to expensive upgrades. Let designers fork out for Adobe products; there are more efficient alternatives for photographers.