jpm31

Looks uggly!

I liked my x-t1 a lot. I sold it and bought a x-t3 and never liked it. Strangely 100 grams make a lot of difference.

Switching from e-m1 mark I to x-t1, I saw a BIG improvement in IQ. Which became even bigger when I bough a x-t3. But - I never tried e-m1 mark II or III - I don't know the 16-80 in the Fuji line ...

I got a Z50 in my hands and seriously considered switching from my x-t3 to a Z50.

Many people buy SUV and never go out asphalt roads. So maybe this new "adventurous" OM-1 will make people who buy it feel like "adventurers" (however poor-spirited they might be).

Perhaps some smaller / lighter lenses, ND, and handheld high res mode? But let's see if it can catch up with Fuji's IQ...

For me too, this is the main point to consider.

I agree, Fuji's menus are not the best, but I find myself using them much less thanks to all buttons and dials.

I had a e-m1. I could never get used to the menu system. I was too many times wondering why the camera had entered a state I could not go out from.

Is there a way to use C1 HDR feature to blend two images like a foreground and background image in astrophography?

I can get one used for 800 euros, here in France, which is more or less what I would pay for a used x-t3. And used fuji lenses are very expensive too, here. They usually sell at a 25% discount ...

In practice, mac laptops tend to have longer life span than their PC counterparts. But you are right : the fact that PC are even worse does not mean that Apple is any good in this respect....

The twitter legend comment about "taking better care of our planet" is ridiculous given how much CO2 was emited for such a useless trip...