PrashantDP

Joined on Aug 30, 2018

Comments

Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

miwashi: Did they fix the tripod mount always breaking?

Yep. Its now metal -SS

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2020 at 05:20 UTC
In reply to:

PrashantDP: Interesting! 50 quid sounds good too...

aaha

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2020 at 21:36 UTC

Interesting! 50 quid sounds good too...

Link | Posted on Sep 23, 2020 at 18:58 UTC as 78th comment | 3 replies

cool

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2020 at 21:20 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Sony a7S III review (2788 comments in total)

$3498 seems a fair price for whats on offer

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2020 at 14:05 UTC as 491st comment
On article Sony a7S III review (2788 comments in total)

Canon R5 left the chat

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2020 at 14:03 UTC as 492nd comment | 9 replies

Great initiative... I'm sure none of these pros come to the DPR comment section.... they just work!

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2020 at 19:08 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Toni Salmonelli: Wow, seems like a bit hit for Sony. This may end the quasi monopoly of Canon and Nikon at the sidelines of big events.

Freelancers switched to Sony in 2016 :)

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2020 at 14:25 UTC

Great!! Now hopefully we'll have less of the annoying DSLR mirror flapping sound during important press briefings and other events.

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2020 at 14:24 UTC as 44th comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

PrashantDP: A73 vs Z5

1- 24 mp BSI vs non BSI
2- 10 FPS with great AF vs 4.5 FPS
3- Better low light performance on the Sony
Better battery.
4- Full width recording for video vs 1.7 crop
5- I guess DR will be better on the Sony
6- Slow motion options vs non on Z5
7- Waaaaaay better lens selections vs very limited expensive system on Nikon.

I am sure that I forgot something that the A7III is superior on.

Difference in price is 400$ only, and you have more saturated market for better lenses.

FromElSayed - SAR

For the first time buyers, considering the native and 3rd party lenses, the Sony system seems more affordable and an overall better choice.

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2020 at 14:25 UTC

A73 vs Z5

1- 24 mp BSI vs non BSI
2- 10 FPS with great AF vs 4.5 FPS
3- Better low light performance on the Sony
Better battery.
4- Full width recording for video vs 1.7 crop
5- I guess DR will be better on the Sony
6- Slow motion options vs non on Z5
7- Waaaaaay better lens selections vs very limited expensive system on Nikon.

I am sure that I forgot something that the A7III is superior on.

Difference in price is 400$ only, and you have more saturated market for better lenses.

FromElSayed - SAR

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2020 at 12:08 UTC as 125th comment | 7 replies

Z5 for $1400 OR the on discount A73 for $1600-1700?

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2020 at 07:56 UTC as 203rd comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

vFunct: RIP Sony.

This is going to sell really, really well, especially at places like Best Buy and Costco, to people getting their first FF camera. Also, the 24-50 is a great selection for that target audience, who are likely going to use it for party/social/family photos as an improvement over their iPhone photos.

Before this year ends, Sony will have 2 or maybe 3 new FF models including a budget FF. Given the lens option...ultimately Sony will be the Winner!

Link | Posted on Jul 21, 2020 at 06:30 UTC

Dear Sony, Please don't change the menu. Thanks.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2020 at 13:35 UTC as 76th comment | 2 replies

IPX0: The product offers no special protection from water.
IPX1: Can resist water that drips vertically onto the product.
IPX2: Can resist water that hits the product at a 15° angle or less.
IPX3: Can take water sprays of up to 60°.
IPX4: Is resistant to water splashes from any direction.
IPX5: Can resist a sustained, low-pressure water jet spray.
IPX6: Can resist high-pressure, heavy sprays of water.
IPX6K: Can resist water jets of extremely high pressure. Rarely used.
IPX7: Can be submerged up to 1 meter in water for 30 minutes.
IPX8: Can be submerged deeper than 1 meter. The exact depth is specified by the manufacturer.
IPX9K: Resists high-pressure, high-temperature sprays at close range. A very special case that’s dictated by a separate standard.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2020 at 03:06 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

William Loney: Weather resistance, not to be confused with water resistance, not to be confused with weather, or water PROOF.
Basically, like every other electronic device to be used 'in field,' most camera companies use vague terms to imply some sort of protection without actually giving any parameters, so as to avoid returns.

IPX0: The product offers no special protection from water.
IPX1: Can resist water that drips vertically onto the product.
IPX2: Can resist water that hits the product at a 15° angle or less.
IPX3: Can take water sprays of up to 60°.
IPX4: Is resistant to water splashes from any direction.
IPX5: Can resist a sustained, low-pressure water jet spray.
IPX6: Can resist high-pressure, heavy sprays of water.
IPX6K: Can resist water jets of extremely high pressure. Rarely used.
IPX7: Can be submerged up to 1 meter in water for 30 minutes.
IPX8: Can be submerged deeper than 1 meter. The exact depth is specified by the manufacturer.
IPX9K: Resists high-pressure, high-temperature sprays at close range. A very special case that’s dictated by a separate standard.

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2020 at 03:05 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T4 review (1491 comments in total)
In reply to:

whumber: Do you get C-AF in 240fps video?

Go read the full press release

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2020 at 06:10 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T4 review (1491 comments in total)
In reply to:

PrashantDP: Nice Camera but at $1700 its in the Full Frame price territory. Now that the EOS R, RP and the A73 come for $900 to $1700. I wish the XT4 was under $1500.

Fuji Lenses are expensive. Full Frame lenses from Sigma Tamaron and others 3rd party manufacturers are actually quite affordable.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2020 at 04:06 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T4 review (1491 comments in total)
In reply to:

whumber: Do you get C-AF in 240fps video?

Nope!

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2020 at 05:10 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-T4 review (1491 comments in total)

Nice Camera but at $1700 its in the Full Frame price territory. Now that the EOS R, RP and the A73 come for $900 to $1700. I wish the XT4 was under $1500.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2020 at 05:09 UTC as 331st comment | 28 replies
Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »