dark goob

Lives in United States Portland, OR, OR, United States
Joined on Jul 12, 2005

Comments

Total: 362, showing: 121 – 140
« First‹ Previous56789Next ›Last »
On article Adobe details OS support for next version of Lightroom (229 comments in total)

Excellent. Time to upgrade, losers

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2015 at 00:36 UTC as 26th comment
On article Hands-on with Nikon's new D5500 (291 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nindy5: I really don't understand why nikon hasnt released a video focused Dslr, canon want to protect their cinema line and so won't budge on giving consumer level anything except moosh. But nikon have no such cinema line to protect, it couldn't be more obvious the opportunity in front of them, they have better quality video on their consumer Dslrs but it's so poorly implemented. This d5500 release is another nail in their coffin.

The Nikons have had decent video features for a couple generations now, with uncompressed HDMI output on even the D3300 for example.

So I'm not sure what you're complaining about really.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2015 at 07:59 UTC
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

Just don't call it "full frame" because the fact that the lens and sensor are the same frame size is an irrelevant detail of the category. If you want to concentrate on 24x36mm sensors then just say so. Referencing the 'fullness' of the frame size is deceiving to consumers who would otherwise not know any better.

Putting Nikon 1 vs. A7 would be stupid, BTW, since Nikon 1 is a whole line of cameras and lenses, whereas A7 is an already out-of-date camera model. Just saying.

Also don't call someone a "noob" who joined DPreview eight years before you.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2014 at 04:46 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (1990 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ramjager: The 5Dmk3 AF system is "behind the times"!
Talk about garbage hyperbole writing.
41 cross sensors? Seriously.
Maybe rather than writing hyperbole the author should spend some time taking photos that require AF rather than making up utter garbage on a keyboard.
The 1DX focus module is still THE BEST action AF system period and the 5Dmk3 uses that very system.
Typical of DPR these days authors with little if any knowledge of the subjects they discuss is a norm
Wakey wakey DPR stop writing hyperbole based off zero experience.
Given how dated the Canon AF module is 90% of the worlds sports photogs should be upgrading from there 1Dx's that dominate sidelines because it's AF is behind the times!
Yea right.

Yeah right.

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2014 at 04:44 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (1990 comments in total)

I usually post negative things here.

But this time DPReview deserves massive credit for calling it like it is.

The D750 is truly the best camera Nikon's ever put out, hands down. The second I took a picture and looked at how it came out, I just kind of knew that it's worth every penny.

Good job, Nikon. More like this!

Link | Posted on Dec 21, 2014 at 04:43 UTC as 366th comment | 2 replies
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

Olympus digital cameras are all full-frame.

They are full-frame relative to Four Thirds. All of the lenses are made specifically for the Four Thirds sensor size. Therefore they are full-frame when used on that body.

Your terminology, like everyone else on this backwards site, is stuck in 2007. Life, and this industry, have moved on.

We are now in an era with many full-frame formats. You can get a whole line of lenses that's full-frame relative to 1", APS-C, Four Thirds, Leica's weird S-series crap (if you're Bruce Wayne), even Pentax's strange "Q" series.

Olympus made the right decision and makes fantastic, professional quality gear. It is you who are delusional. I would put a lot of money on the fact you're not a good enough photographer to where the sensor size is the limiting factor in your photography.

In fact Jay Dickman, a Pulitzer-prize-winning, National Geographic photographer uses Micro Four Thirds. If sensor size was the limiting factor why would he use it?

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 07:11 UTC
On article Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) (145 comments in total)
In reply to:

Impulses: Uhh, no MFT cameras? I'm guessing they were left out because no new entry level bodies were released this year... Could've swore I remember MFT (GF6 or a PEN) being included in a similar roundup last year. At the same time tho, the A3000 and others here were also 2013 releases, and you can get a mid to high end GX7 or E-M10 for the price of the X-M1...

I'm not implying a conspiracy, but I would expect a conflict of interest to some degree.

That being said I guess only you would know if I'm wrong or not.

I've got my own beefs with Amazon for various crap they've pulled like blocking third-party sellers from their listings of the Sony A77 Mk II combos on Black Friday. They constantly break their own rules. That was really crappy.

I think you've got a tough call to make in a sense, I mean, we both know the A3000 is basically a piece of garbage compared to the X-M1 and E-PL7, but it's also a lot cheaper. I don't even put them in the same category, but they're the entry-level mirror-less cameras from Fuji and Oly. Sony just happens to be a much bigger operation and is cranking out fairly low-end stuff and undercutting everyone. The real question is whether it's even worth buying the junk the brands are putting out under $500. I mean with inflation, $700 is equivalent to $500 of 2008. I hate to recommend beginners to get crap.

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 04:55 UTC
On article Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) (145 comments in total)
In reply to:

Impulses: Uhh, no MFT cameras? I'm guessing they were left out because no new entry level bodies were released this year... Could've swore I remember MFT (GF6 or a PEN) being included in a similar roundup last year. At the same time tho, the A3000 and others here were also 2013 releases, and you can get a mid to high end GX7 or E-M10 for the price of the X-M1...

They left out MFT because Amazon isn't paying them to promote brands that Amazon isn't paying them to promote. This site still says "dpreview" at the top and some of the staff has the same names, but it's not dpreview anymore. This is no longer an objective site (if it ever was) it's a brand shill site now and always will be. It's owned by Amazon and has no integrity whatsoever.

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 18:26 UTC
On article Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Roundup (2014) (145 comments in total)

Wow where's Olympus??? Really, DPREVIEW?

Fail!

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 18:24 UTC as 29th comment | 2 replies
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

@zxaar, if you think being good enough for 90% of photography is fine, then great. The people who aren't willing to give up that extra 10% will get a real DSLR with a complete lens and flash system around it.

In a few more years the mirrorless cameras will have caught up.

I mean, I'm with you though, as I mention above I use OM-D E-M1 and I love it. Heck I made a 12-foot tall prints from my E-5 that is displayed permanently in public and it gets lots of compliments. Nobody ever says, "That wasn't full-frame."

All the arguments in favor of 6D vs. A7 are just as irrelevant as the arguments in favor of A7 vs. EM-1 for the same 90% of users that you mention.

That's why I personally think it's irresponsible of DPReview not to include professional cameras like the EM-1 in a round-up like this. It's technically a full-frame system (relative to M43).

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 05:39 UTC
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

@Zeisschen

It's not just startup time. It's the time required to change settings, the time required to change batteries (and the frequency with which this must be done). Believe me, I shoot an OM-D E-M1, so I live with the realities of mirrorless shooting all the time, and there are times where I find it very annoying. I've used an A7 a lot as well, and I just felt it suffers from the same annoyances as all other mirrorless cameras I've used. Changing settings like ISO has a delay to it compared to a DSLR. If you don't notice that delay, that.. interface lag.. then more power to you. But I notice it and bugs the hell out of me.

It's like the difference between using Android, and using iOS. Many people don't notice the difference in lagginess and usability.

At any rate the size and weight advantages of mirrorless are possibly a good trade-off. Lag and speed issues, along with battery life, will probably be a non-issue in a few years especially with graphene processors and sensors.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 05:33 UTC
On article WaterWeight rethinks the sandbag approach to stability (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

dark goob: LOL I've been duct taping and bungeeing water bottles to my stuff for years. Then I switched to beer, and my reward for finishing the shoot is to drink said beer and xfer the weight to my belly.

My ballast never shifts, dude. Ever.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2014 at 04:39 UTC
On article WaterWeight rethinks the sandbag approach to stability (77 comments in total)

LOL I've been duct taping and bungeeing water bottles to my stuff for years. Then I switched to beer, and my reward for finishing the shoot is to drink said beer and xfer the weight to my belly.

Link | Posted on Dec 9, 2014 at 03:36 UTC as 49th comment | 3 replies
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

@Scheisschen -

If your camera hasn't turned on yet, and you miss the shot, then how much does image quality matter? So now you must keep it on all the time, which is lame because on mirrorless cameras the battery is already smaller and every second the camera is turned on uses exponentially more power than with a DSLR (with live view off).

People do care about picture quality but we are splitting hairs between most of these cameras, as you know. If you're a pro, your customer is likely much more interested that you got the right pictures, rather than infinitesimal differences in what it looks like blown up 200% in Photoshop.

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 05:42 UTC
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)
In reply to:

halfwaythere: Its pretty sad that even dpr has succumbed to the " low ISO dynamic range matters above all" theory.

I think most enthusiast FF users are using these bodies for their low light, high ISO, superiority. I don't get how is the A7 recommended above the 6D since the latter has access to the most comprehensive system while the former is, basically, a cheap mirrorless camera that happens to have a FF sensor.

6D's much longer battery life and much faster startup time, IMHO, are far more important advantages than anything to do with the actual image quality.

Because what good is a picture you didn't get, due to a dead battery or because your camera didn't "boot up" fast enough?

Link | Posted on Dec 8, 2014 at 05:27 UTC
On article High-end full frame roundup (2014) (610 comments in total)

Where is Leica on your list? Also, why limit it to just 35mm?

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2014 at 23:05 UTC as 108th comment | 3 replies

Non-mirrorless ... ...

Link | Posted on Dec 4, 2014 at 22:53 UTC as 33rd comment
On article Real-world test: Going pro with the Samsung NX1 (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

Adrien S: So... I totally need a body with these specs BUT A FULL-FRAME SENSOR.

On the day they release a FF body with similar specifications (and a comparatively low price!), Samsung can just take my money.

Point is I'm right. "Full frame" is a meaningless term these days. CHANGE THE LINGO. It's stupid!

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2014 at 08:02 UTC
On article Real-world test: Going pro with the Samsung NX1 (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

Adrien S: So... I totally need a body with these specs BUT A FULL-FRAME SENSOR.

On the day they release a FF body with similar specifications (and a comparatively low price!), Samsung can just take my money.

Yes, it is. All the Samsung NX lenses are full frame relative to the APS-C sensor in the NX-1 body. "Full frame" defines a *relationship* between the lens and sensor, it does not define a specific size. Just because all you idiots abuse the English language and misuse this term doesn't change the meaning of the words.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2014 at 08:06 UTC
On article Real-world test: Going pro with the Samsung NX1 (370 comments in total)

I love how they never mentioned battery life, once, in this video.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2014 at 07:34 UTC as 42nd comment | 3 replies
Total: 362, showing: 121 – 140
« First‹ Previous56789Next ›Last »