Meuh

Meuh

Lives in United Kingdom Kirkintilloch, United Kingdom
Works as a Photographer, studio owner.
Has a website at www.thekirkystudio.com
Joined on Feb 16, 2008

Comments

Total: 88, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Mateus1: Is it possible to mount to SD Quattro H (with adapter) Zeiss manual lenses - Loxia, C/Y or Nikon/Leica monut? Any issues?

Yea Zos, although the Quattro does away with nost of the color cast problem of the sd1M but lens need to Jane a high revolving power or they will look soft on the sdQ-H.

I tried the 56mm f2 helios, at f2 evrything is soft.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2017 at 09:08 UTC
In reply to:

photofisher: I don't know folks......I was debating between this and a used Nikon d800 and I'm glad I went with the Nikon. Nice pictures, though.

Mfritter. That's what I do but my Sony gets left at home unless I'm shooting events.

Not everyone likes the Sony bodys though so not really an option for them but its a great feature if the SA lens system.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2017 at 09:04 UTC
In reply to:

pkcpga: Kind of reminds me of old ccd sensors with better resolution but still the same noise issues, weird color artifacts, really poor jpegs, hard to work with shadow areas and lots of yellow tinge at ISO 400 or above. Only thing going for it is iso 100 resolution.

Zodiacfml.

Jpgs from the sdQ/sdQ-H are great, much better than the Merrills

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 18:38 UTC
In reply to:

webrunner5: Wow, this thing could end up making a really good studio portrait camera.

I've shot studio work in JPG on the sdQ-H at 51mp and it was fairly consistent and delivered great results, I've also used it in JPG to do packet shots of plants for a local plant nursery because the IQ was better than that of my Sony in Raw (a7ii).

X3f is also great, I've not used DNG much as I felt i got more out of editing the x3f but its something I will keep an eye on but I do know someone who uses DNG and gets on well with it using colorchecker.

If you want to see what this camera can do in a studio setting then check one of my images which was a raw to jpg (no editing).

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s5o2d1lrmhcoh4c/SDIM00092.jpg?dl=0

or to see how it works in the real world then there's this shot using Firecrest ND filters (4stop + cpl) and a 120cm octa on location.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/e07ghjnutsryyou/SDIM05332.jpg?dl=0

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 18:34 UTC
In reply to:

Mateus1: Is it possible to mount to SD Quattro H (with adapter) Zeiss manual lenses - Loxia, C/Y or Nikon/Leica monut? Any issues?

you can use m42 lens.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 18:26 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: Sensor tech is fine, kudos to Sigma.
If only they hired someone to create usable camera designs and improve overall user experience? That would be something.

Yea she likes nikons and loved the grip on the d3, the k3 and a7ii are to small for her, I guess a battery grip would help but she loves the grip on the sdQ-H.

I found the d3 too big (with strange layout), the k3 was almost perfect for me that was till I held the sdQ-H :)

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 15:26 UTC
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: Don't get me wrong, I've always been a Foveon fan since forever, and actually wanted to buy this camera up until 1 hour ago, but...

Am I seeing things here? Apply just a mild touch of sharpening and noise becomes super visible in the shadows (in some cases in the mid tones as well, ISO 100).

And huh???? Shadow lifting by just 1 stop reveals horrendous blotches of green and magenta, like the ones I used to get with a defective Leaf Aptus unit, which I demanded Phase One to trade for a new unit (which they did for free).

I'm not bashing, I'm asking if you guys are seeing the same?

kreislauf

No the dp merrills are amazing for what they produce send the size but stick the 50-100 f1.8 Art on the sdq-h and goto 100mm f1.8 and shoot a full lengh shot of someone and you get amazing detail and subject isolation that can't be done on the dp3m.

I love my dp1m and dp3m but I tend to use the sdQ-H these days with the 18-35 f1.8 and 50-100 f1.8 in my bag but it is much more weight and size.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 15:24 UTC
In reply to:

Triplet Perar: Sensor tech is fine, kudos to Sigma.
If only they hired someone to create usable camera designs and improve overall user experience? That would be something.

I also feel that the sdQ/sdQH is a great feeling camera, even my wifes first reaction of holding one was "now this is a camera" as she hates the smaller a7ii, even my k3 which was a great camera design anoyed her as she missed my old nikon d3.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 08:11 UTC
In reply to:

marcio_napoli: Don't get me wrong, I've always been a Foveon fan since forever, and actually wanted to buy this camera up until 1 hour ago, but...

Am I seeing things here? Apply just a mild touch of sharpening and noise becomes super visible in the shadows (in some cases in the mid tones as well, ISO 100).

And huh???? Shadow lifting by just 1 stop reveals horrendous blotches of green and magenta, like the ones I used to get with a defective Leaf Aptus unit, which I demanded Phase One to trade for a new unit (which they did for free).

I'm not bashing, I'm asking if you guys are seeing the same?

Marcio.

I have the sdQ-H and love the files from it, heres a sooc (raw to jpg) portrait I took using the 85mm f1.4 Art wide open.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/j7ndmv4d2tnnzpb/SDIM0009.jpg?dl=0

Also the DNG files I feel are not as good as the x3fs but still a great addition to help speed up work flow.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2017 at 08:08 UTC
In reply to:

meanwhile: Have they said whether DNG support is coming to older cameras or not?

its already out :D

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 20:35 UTC
In reply to:

Contra Mundum: What's the hubbub? DNG can only represent Bayer raw formats. The Sigma DNG is a just a TIFF in DNG container. Your raw is already cooked in DNG.
The difference with jpeg is mostly in the number of bits. So you could as well edit the jpeg files from the camera with the same success, except for the pictures that require a serious surgery, which are probably not worth saving anyway.

I still like the x3f's, not sure why but I feel I can get a little more out of them than the DNG but the DNG is a great option to speed things up a lot.

I have even shot Jpg from the sdQ-H in Super Hi (51mp) for studio stuff (headshots) where I was in control of everything and was very happy with the results :)

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 20:31 UTC
In reply to:

fatdeeman: Although it's a shame the tech doesn't get the respect it deserves, I'm glad that Sigma develops it because if Canon/Nikon/Samsung etc had suffered the same lack of commercial success they would have dropped it years ago. Sigma have done this out of love and probably made little or no profit. It might not make them millions but I'm sure there's a sense of satisfaction in possessing what is in some aspects the best sensor tech out there.

The bonus is.. if you buy into the Sigma SA lens which is required for the Foveon cameras you CAN also use the same lens on a FF Bayer using the MC-11.

So with one set of lens you get the best of both Foveon and Bayer... which is a unique selling point that not many people understand.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 17:00 UTC
In reply to:

Toselli: I wonder how that sensor would deal with wide angle leica mount lenses, especially the voigtlanders (if they would make a shorter lens mount, of course).

Toselli.

The sdQ/sdQ-H was designed around using Sigmas Global lens range and balances really well.. for example, I can hold with one had the sdQ-H with 50-100 f1.8 Art but the same lens on my Sony a7ii want's to snap my wrist.

Going mirrorless from what I understand was more about getting more accurate Autofocus by doing it on chip, It's much easier for me to use my f1.8 zooms on the sdQ-H than it was on the sd1m.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 16:55 UTC
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: ...but who owns one?

I do and love it.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2017 at 14:29 UTC
In reply to:

cosinaphile: i wouda been all over these cameras if they had the sense to offer short flange distance like mirrorlesss should .... it could have been done with a dedicated adapter supplied with the camera that could have provided 2 flange distances to allow adapted lenses to be used with this innovative detail rich sensor

another to use the sigma long flange lens type with af

Well the SA mount lens work on Sony using the MC-11 so you can get the best of both worlds.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2017 at 15:34 UTC
In reply to:

41mm: I own 3 of the dp quattro series cameras and would be very happy if SIGMA implement the DNG functionality to the Quattro compact cameras. Same Sensor, same processor. JUST DO IT SIGMA !!!

The sdQ has dual cpus and double the ram overt the dps if I remember correctly so while the dps technically should be able to use DNG it might slow them down.

Still would be a nice option.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2017 at 15:30 UTC
In reply to:

cosinaphile: i wouda been all over these cameras if they had the sense to offer short flange distance like mirrorlesss should .... it could have been done with a dedicated adapter supplied with the camera that could have provided 2 flange distances to allow adapted lenses to be used with this innovative detail rich sensor

another to use the sigma long flange lens type with af

You can use m42 lens on the sdQ but you have to remember that the sensor is very demanding, my old 56mm f2 helios for example looks nice on my a7ii but very soft on the sdQH till its stopped down a bit and even then it can't match sigma ms f1.8 zooms even with them wide open.

While I welcome the idea of a smaller version of the sdQ with a smaller flange distance and lens the sdQ (and sdQH) are designed around using the DSLR line and the design of the body supports this (large with great grip).

The sdQH with 85mm Art is much nicer to hold than the a7ii using the same lens (due to the small size and lack of good grip).

I know its not a camera for everyone but honestly I only use Bayer for high iso stuff as the IQ from the Sigma at base iso is something else and my a7ii spends most of its time in a bag.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 07:39 UTC
On article Hasselblad X1D-50c First Impressions Review (316 comments in total)
In reply to:

ybizzle: X1D has little advantage over the Canon 5DS-R at ISO 100/200 but does have better noise performance at higher ISO settings. If I was mainly shooting low ISO, I would be tempted to just get the 5DS-R and save a good chunk.

There's a french website that shows the sdQ-H out-resolving the 5DS-R so if your shooting at base iso that could be another consideration as its even more of a saving, especially when you factor in lens like the 50-100 f1.8 Art.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2017 at 21:03 UTC
In reply to:

rgs_45: The interview, to me, was good, honest and to the point as someone posters mentioned. I like the way Sigma is coming out and filling some of the big camera manufacturers lens line with good, better and AFFORDABLE (lenses) products.

My thing is, why can't Sigma make their lens(es) to focus just as good or better/faster than the CaniKon, Sony, etc? I'm in the process of getting a Sigma SD Quattro H plus a ouple of lenses but from what I gather on the Sigma forum, is that, their own lens and own body does not focus as fast as the one built for others? Could it be that the CaniKon or Sony, etc has better focusing design/mechanism on their camera bodies/sensor? If so, why can't Sigma redesign their camera focusing system to work with own lens as good or better than the rest?

Anyway, keep up the good work Sigma. Keep bringing better and AFFORDABLE lenses for the rest of us, even though I don't own any Sigma lens at the moment.

The focus speed on the sdQ and sdQ-H will be down to sensor read speed.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 22:30 UTC
In reply to:

Jack Simpson: My question is, if not already mentioned, why would you not mount the lens a camera where an adapter was not needed?

tbcass,

True they don't make a high resolution FF camera but as RaghavBaijal pointed out I was on about the adapter :)

Still Sigma do make a 25.6mp apsh camera now and I enjoy it very much :)

Link | Posted on Feb 8, 2017 at 22:52 UTC
Total: 88, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »