FDecker

Beautiful pictures with a very special mood. No 1 is my favorite. Do you also have an unconverted camera with you or an additional IR blocker on hikes like this? If not, I think it shows a brave ...

This reads like a detailed analysis what happened here. With a bias from your side, but that’s OK. I think you miss out one point. Something you didn‘t read? In the post directly after the post to ...

Do you have another chair for me as well? I feel like I need a rest. Again...

Thnx, and while you were typing, I found out that you solved it. Funny, as the internet can be... It shows that I am typing too slowly...

Forget this post, just read you solved it. Interesting that a change in the FW of the camera now allows to set WB in SPP.

I don‘t use SPP 3.5.2 or 4.2. While going from the SD14 to the 15, 1, Quattro, I go with the latest SPP versions and forget about the older ones. But in SPP, there is the option to choose if the ...

Ok, last try. TN Args, there is nothing to admit. First, I know the articles. I owned the SD1 and still own the sd Quattro H and you can believe me, I read everything I can about cameras I intend ...

Not quite. For most scenes, the DR of a Foveon will be good enough. But there are scenes that can‘t be properly captured with a Foveon. And if highlights are blown or shadows drowned, they are ...

I think this is spot on.

Hold you horses TN Args. Rude and disrespectful as ever. I leave it like this. Good bye.

Maybe I am wrong but this explains in detail what Imaging Resource does to evaluate the DR of cameras. Isn‘t that linked to what you wrote? Especially the high, medium, low quality approach. Of ...

The best may be to read the respective part of Imatest‘s online help: https://www.imatest.com/solutions/dynamic-range/

This is a quote from Imaging Resource’s webpage: Dynamic Range Analysis (RAW mode) While we once performed our own dynamic range measurements based on in-camera JPEGs as well as converted RAW ...

No, not at all. But in my example, it is like trading resolution vs. DR. The same happens when oversampling data and using digital filters to trade-in time resolution vs. DR (via better S/N).

I think it is valid. It really depends on the representation of the sensor output. High MP cameras typically have less DR on pixel level because their pixel size is lower (assuming the same sensor ...

As so often, it depends on what you show. Bill Claff is using a term "photographic dynamic range". I think, as part of this, he scales DR depending on the resolution. The approach is close to what ...

Small correction, the IMX 461 is used in the GFX 100, the GFX 50 and the X1d use the IMX 161.

The monitor uses 8bit to display the image. This is the same if you crank up the maximum brightness or not. It stays 8 bits.

In principle, yes. But no, it is not. The top layer is thinner than the photodiodes of a CFA sensor. This is necessary in order to keep the top layer dominated by the short wavelengths. And to let ...

I think it is a deduction or correlation fault. Mathematically, the problem is ill-posed or under-determined.