Erik Lundqvist

Joined on Mar 3, 2017


Total: 1, showing: 1 – 1
On article What is equivalence and why should I care? (2505 comments in total)
In reply to:

amblepath: I fall into the more depth of field is an advantage most of the time camp. I know it's hard to accept for some that less depth of field to many is a con and yet it truly is. With m4/3 for instance you get to keep the quick shutter speed of the widest aperture and still keep vital areas in focus. Software also is getting better and better for blurring backgrounds if you need more. This leaves high ISO noise as the only con for me from smaller sensors like m4/3 and APS-C. So if the best in high ISO is your need then it's full frame for you. Otherwise remember more depth of field for your average photographer is often, possibly even mostly a pro not a con.

Thanks for a great article Richard! And thanks for doing such a great job answering peoples questions!

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2017 at 21:52 UTC
Total: 1, showing: 1 – 1