RaghavBaijal

RaghavBaijal

Joined on Sep 23, 2011

Comments

Total: 123, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm X-H1 Review (1579 comments in total)
In reply to:

RaghavBaijal: It might just be me, but I would really like to see Fuji shrink down the IBIS components so they can include it on the XT3 and XT30 too. I won't mind if its not as good as the one on the XH1. Even if it offers only a 2 - 3 stop advantage, its still worth having. Something is always better than nothing.

makofoto
Just look at the Sony A6500. Fuji says their IBIS is better than 'Others' on the market. That's great and everything, but I wouldn't mind having slightly crappier IBIS packed into a XT2 Body style/size. I'm sure its possible. Sony proves it.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2018 at 19:03 UTC
In reply to:

Featherchaser: People need to stop confusing mirrorless cameras with innovative cameras. Video started with a DSLR, DSLTs started from DSLRs, Live View started from DSLRs, medium format couldn't give a damn about whether you have a mirror, but yet somehow DSLR=reeeeee needs muh innovayshun and mirrorless = yay! more camcorder in my stills camera yay!

Technically, even mirrorless started from DSLR. They are very innovative. They employ a completely new system of AF and EVF compared to a DSLR.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2018 at 15:51 UTC
On article Fujifilm X-H1 Review (1579 comments in total)

It might just be me, but I would really like to see Fuji shrink down the IBIS components so they can include it on the XT3 and XT30 too. I won't mind if its not as good as the one on the XH1. Even if it offers only a 2 - 3 stop advantage, its still worth having. Something is always better than nothing.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2018 at 22:50 UTC as 178th comment | 5 replies

This looks like a really Kickass camera. Now Tamron, release that 28 70 f2.8 Zoom! Sigma, feel free to join the fun. You are missed.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2018 at 02:32 UTC as 264th comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS M50 Review (1244 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: A 2.56x crop in video makes a system without ultra wide lenses almost useless for video. You can't even use the excellent dual pixel AF in 4K video mode. This camera is just absurd at this price.

If it were $250 it would at least be reasonable as a super budget camera. There are so many better options than this camera.

Wait a few months. It may just drop to $250

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2018 at 15:36 UTC
In reply to:

JOrmsby: Meh. No interest in going back to full frame. Really wish this was a 16-50 f/2.8 for E-mount instead.

@IdM photography: Check this link

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/59900549

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2018 at 21:08 UTC

If this is reasonably priced and offers better IQ than the Zony 24 70 F4 and Sony 24 105 G, then this would be an absolutely AWESOME addition to the FE Lineup.

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2018 at 20:54 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies

If this lens has good control on Coma & CA wide open, this might be a new favorite for the APSC Astro-Photography Enthusiasts.

Really looking forward to pricing & tests.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2017 at 17:11 UTC as 8th comment
On article Sony announces lightweight FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS lens (276 comments in total)

If Sony had launched this lens a few months ago, I might have switched from Sony APSC E Mount to Sony Fullframe instead of Fuji. Sony just need to update the Ageing A7II. Its ISO and AF performance is not up to the mark.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2017 at 19:49 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies

Pocket for Film! XD

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2017 at 17:06 UTC as 77th comment
On photo Bruce Green in the -Yuge and Nasty- challenge (2 comments in total)

Slitherin' Sucatash!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2017 at 20:45 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Barley in the Alone challenge (2 comments in total)

The sky is just waaay tooo dark. Kind of detracts from an otherwise excellent image.

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 21:59 UTC as 1st comment

If you buy one, it won't be long before problems 'Surface'.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 18:01 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Hypoxic: This is rubbish, I'm using a surface pro right now and it nev

@melgross

It broke down in mid sentence...

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2017 at 17:35 UTC

How in the world did he take Image Number 7?!

Link | Posted on Jul 31, 2017 at 19:29 UTC as 9th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

RaghavBaijal: ROFL...

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_1=fujifilm_xt20&attr144_2=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_3=sony_a6000&attr146_0=100_5&attr146_1=200_5&attr146_2=100_5&attr146_3=100_5&normalization=compare&widget=542&x=0.124786377&y=0.5025702

@Shiranai.
Fuji Picture is using ISO 200 + 4 EV Push = Fuji ISO 3200
Canon Picture is using ISO 100 + 4 EV Push = Canon ISO 1600

So, the playing field is still level. There is no advantage to the Fuji in this comparison.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 20:51 UTC

ROFL...

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr144_0=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_1=fujifilm_xt20&attr144_2=canon_eos6dmkii&attr144_3=sony_a6000&attr146_0=100_5&attr146_1=200_5&attr146_2=100_5&attr146_3=100_5&normalization=compare&widget=542&x=0.124786377&y=0.5025702

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 18:44 UTC as 197th comment | 18 replies

Freaking Lawyers !!

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2017 at 00:51 UTC as 152nd comment
On article Fujifilm X-A3 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sezano: I just stole an X-A1 with all the accessories known to man for $150 on Ebay. I was shocked at how amazing the output is. Blows my X-T10 out of the water, its collecting dust, so much so that now I'm thinking I got a subpar copy. Probably not.

I'm disappoint X-A3 is not getting a better review.

Subpar copy of a camera!!??
Mmm... I don't think so...

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2017 at 19:13 UTC
On article SainSonic launches 50mm F1.1 lens for APS-C cameras (257 comments in total)

I hope they make a version with an APD (Apodization Filter) like the Sony 100mm STF or the Fuji 56mm 1.2 APD. This is Manual Focus anyways. Even if you loose a couple of stops of light that would be still ok since its a f1.1 lens. If they could improve the Bokeh with that APD Filter, that would be awesome.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2017 at 17:57 UTC as 19th comment | 3 replies
Total: 123, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »