inthecards

They fixed this in the EOS M50 and PowerShot G1X III; I've tried the M50 and they fixed it, and I own the G1X III and they fixed it. EOS R shouldn't share the same fate as the EOS M5, which I owned ...

It's continuous AF; it's on by default I believe. Runs as a background process, it's sorta a cheat: As the name implies it constantly focuses with the AF method chosen, until, you half or full ...

Totally makes sense. Really appreciate the input as someone who's handled the 5DIV, EOS M50 and now EOS R. That answers my question and suspicion about the EOS R. The traditional AF system is ...

It's (third party compatibility) being accomplished because the EF and F mount protocols are dated and things like encryption, signing etc, weren't coming into play and you need to maintain ...

Canon has the connectivity but not the readout. Sony has the readout but not connectivity ironically. That said no camera manufacturer wants this as it obsoletes offerings, but smartphones do, as ...

It's not for everyone. Only certain groups. That adapter does take EF-S optics though. I suspect Canon is targeting the small but powerful crowd (that's less cost sensitive) and those wanting to ...

My bet; 8 of those 12 pins maintain existing comms. 4 of those 12 pins are new comms. Those 4 pins are high speed: akin to UHS-I vs UHS-II. These are camera makers after all, not computer nerds. Th ...

Not ruling them out, they'd have to be EF, not R, mount, which isn't ideal. It's not the end of the world either though as with economical third party choices it's always some kind of compromise, ...

Sadly, not yet. Usually around 2 weeks prior to ship date, Popco, they're a Korean photo website, does a sort of advertisement which they label as a review. But, it has lots of sample images, and ...

Interesting rumor. It won't be a APS-C R; it'll be a compact FF. At the risk of repeating myself, I'd bet you lunch that 26MP FF mirrorless in Nokishita this morning is an R100; a no EVF, no grip, ...

Remind you (think you already know), it's lenses that keep folks bound to a system, and make a system. There are many optics that are only in a given system. Right now Canon's got 3 special ...

How? Okay, lets say they do. The moment you intentionally crack Canon's encryption/signing, Canon (or Nikon), will come after you, legally. Sadly the days of 3rd party lenses are now confined to EF ...

I don't disagree with either your assessment of the intent of the article (to slow EOS R / RF adoption), or DPR's opinion as even as a pro-Canon leaning person, they're right. Those RF lenses ...

It's like every review of the EOS M50 (which I'd largely compare the EOS R to), it's uninspiring on spec sheet, but in person / real life use, it's a different beast. I've shot the A6300 and A6500 ...

A long time. With the change of pins, Sigma will have no choice but to reverse engineer the new interconnect (that's easy) and the protocol (that's hard these days). The EF protocol is going on 30 ...

That's one thing Canon can do, more MP. Look at the 5DSR or their 120MP FF sensor (that they haven't made a consumer offering of yet)? But it does come at what cost of imaging metrics (ISO ...

CR / CW thinks it's the 7D refresh; I agree because the 7D uses the same battery indicator and the resolution is about what the new APS-C sensor should be per the rumormill. Of course this could be ...

Sadly this registrations indicates 26MP; it's the 6DII sensor. So not this round. Now that's a thought; I just assumed it'd be the M5 II, but, it's probably the M5 II and M6 II... Hmph. G7X III; ...

Oh, I agree. When I first held the M50, I said, what if, Canon gave it M5 treatment and could already see the writing on the wall for what looks to be the M5 II. It looks like the 90D sensor just ...

That first one (EOS R) appears to use a modified form of the 6DII sensor (26MP); sounds like Canon's being bullish here with releasing lower end models first; that's not very Canon-like, but given ...