tn1krr

This one https://helpguide.sony.net/ilc/1710/v1/en/contents/TP0001629777.html

I've borrowed my friends 7DII and compared it with my Sony A7RIII in shooting high speed motorcycle racing with a long lens. The blackout (A7RIII has sensor readout of 1/30 sec so blackout is ...

Well aware of those spec sheets; some from last year list 16 bit ADCs. That still does not mean you have hardware/software in place to use such read mode in actual camera; for example if A7RIV had ...

Oh dear, I though we already guided you to logical conclusion here, since * there is no original data other than analog charge in the pixel * that is converted to a numeric value using analog to ...

Of course it has to do with DR. The higher the DR of the sensor the more bits you need to store all different intensity levels in each color channel to provide "enough" separation; also the very ...

Because we have measurement that show that FF sensor dynamic range "fits" quite nicely inside 14 bit RAW channels. Once we move a few stops away from base ISO even 12 bits is enough MF cameras have ...

PS and Lightroom processing/adjustment bit depth is not constrained by imported RAW bit depth, they use 16 bits per channel on edit space. Adding 2 bits noise from 14 to 16 bits in RAW file does ...

A lot of good/sensible recommendations already about 50/90 mm FE Macros. One lens that keeps surprising me is GM 100-400 with its short focusing distance; between 300 and 400 mm it gives good ...

Yes, looks about same as 1DXIII; quite nice considering the resolution bumb. When I tested my A7RIV I had to tweak the exposure/shutter speed to get most clear lines, but your pics puts R5 around ...

Do this simple led stripe test. Takes only a few minutes. Can be used to quite accurate full sensor readout speed https://blog.kasson.com/a7riv/how-fast-is-the-sony-a7riv-silent-shutter/

Canon Europe has spec pages up that confirm 12 bit ADC for electronic shutter for both R5 and R6; seems to also confirm that in R6 Hi+ EFCS does not drop to 13 bit. Not surprising for high fps ...

I've had one on my A7RIV since last year; so much better than the original one.

I've got both. Batis focuses way better and despite op not caring it is over a stop faster. Also,  despite 90/2.8 Macro being supersharp  in macro distances it is not a world beater on longer ...

You must mean about 37% more resolution and almost twice the megapixels. A9 series capability is much more than just the FPS. Anyone who has shot A7-series and A9 is high FPS with moving targets ...

Sony A9/A9II can provide no-blackout EVF due to superfast stacked sensor readout speed (1/160 secs). Even at 20 fps the full sensor readouts only take 12.5% of available time from sensor, rest of ...

Actually I formulated my writing a bit poorly. You'll get faster 12-bit mode when you are shooting both continuous drive mode and compressed RAW (or jpg). This applies to both mechanical and ...

A7III is readout speed 1/30 with compressed RAW/jpg (12 bit readout is faster), but A9 is still far superior. For concert photography even the 1/15 (A7III shooting uncompressed RAW) should be ...

In theory they could, but I'd say this is very very unlikely. Sony has spent gazillion dollars to get their fabs into level that can produce stacked sensors and have not yet mass produced stacked ...

Based on the scant specs it looks like a great camera, but nothing in that spec makes it a competition to A9/A9II, because - even if it had sensor as fast 1DXIII (1/60secs full sensor readout) it ...

Patents are only a small part of high end sensor manufacturing; Canon has had BSI sensor patens for years too, but they are yet to make one. Sony has invested billions and billions over the years...