Tony Rogers

Sad but true.

Because he has decided that he can't possibly use a camera that has a fully-articulating screen and so is on a mission to persuade everyone else that it is crap.

This is one of those pointless threads that are so common on the m43 forum. Everybody understands the difference between the sensors in the E-M1 and E-M1 Mk 2 and what's more they agree on what ...

This is all wrong! The distinction between H and L speeds has nothing to do with tracking (i.e. the C-AF+Tr AF mode), it depends only on whether C-AF is available. So, it goes like this: (1) Electronic ...

Interesting example. Thanks for taking the time to show me.

Sorry to drag up this old thread but I thought of one more thing I could have done to improve the first kingfisher shot which I don't think we discussed. What I could have done was use ISO 100. ...

You mean the current E-M1 and the new one!

Try here . [Sequential shooting H] approx. 15 fps with selectable 10-15 fps (AF / AE locked) [Sequential shooting L] approx. 10 fps with selectable 1-10 fps (including AF tracking: C-AF+TR) [Anti-s ...

That's interesting, and you may be right but I'm still surprised Olymous don't say readout speed is "more than twice as fast" or "2.5x faster" or "3 times faster". Presumably, because they can ...

I've seen it a couple of times such as in this interview here .

I'm a bit puzzled. The sensor in the new E-M1 MkII is said to have a readout speed that is twice the speed of the Pen-F sensor. Also, the rolling shutter effect will be half that of the current ...

My keeper rate for bif with the E-M1 is probably less than 10%. And that is from a technical perspective. i.e. is it in focus. I'm hoping the E-M1 II will get me to 50%.

Yes.

Yes, that's a good point. It will be very hard to keep the 5-area group over the target though if it is moving.

Well, the way I see it is like this. A long telephoto might benefit from having three focal ranges to choose from. Say 1m - 3m, 3m - 10m and 5m to infinity. So, I set these three ranges in Set1, 2 ...

This will only be a worthwhile feature if the 3 settings are stored for each lens used. They do have a lens database in the camera which stores AF adjustment on a per lens basis. However, I fully ...

Absolutely right. If I feel that Olympus "mis-sell" this to me, I will be so angry! Good sense tells me not to be an early adopter and to wait for the reviews (for what their worth in this regard ...

This page - https://www.olympus.com.au/Products/Interchangeable-Lens-Cameras/OLYMPUS-OM-D/E-M1-Mark-II/Features/Mobility-Reliability - seems to show a battery with all sharp edges, unlike the E-M1 ...

lso from the GetOlympus web site: (1) AF System TypeHigh-speed imager AF: Imager phase detection AF and imager contrast AF ( active AF automatically selected by camera; when a Micro Four Thirds lens is ...

The big thing for me is how well does the C-AF work. A few questions/observations: (1) The focus points are now smaller than on the Mk1. There is an 11 x 11 array of points instead of 9 x 9 covering a ...