RaymondR

When I purchased my Panny 100-300 my body was an EM10 mk I and I choose the 100-300 over the other m4/3 telephotos of similar reach in part because there was an available collar mount from a third ...

Taken at Back to the Wild animal rehab center in Castalia, Ohio:

that surprised me a bit too.  I have a family of groundhogs that live at the back of my yard and they are more brownish.

this is precisely why equivalence threads are so polarizing in the fora.  Many of us in smaller than FF formats simply do not care about the concept.  Most of us, myself included, understand what ...

OK, here we go again.  I DON'T CARE ABOUT EQUIVALENCE. Find me FF lenses that match my lineup of m4/3 lenses that come even close in cost, size and weight: Oly 12-40 2.8 Only 60mm 2.8 macro Panny ...

very happy with my G9 and since I came from the DSLR world I like the top display!

now do that with zooms. would be really interested to see smaller, lighter FF zooms to replace my Oly 12-40 2.8, my Lumix 35-100 2.8, my lumix/leica 8-16 2.8-4, and my lumix 100-300.  All of which ...

yes, the photo was taken at a Zoo where the Koala is sometimes exhibited inside and sometimes outside.  this was taken inside.  The interior walls are painted to simulate the Koala's native ...

of course the tcl conversion lets gets you there (35 mm as 50mm efov) and the icl conversion lens takes you to efov 28mm.  I have both and there is no meaningful IQ fall off from using them.  Some ...

you might find something like the Panny Leica 8-18 more useful for landscapes than one of the fast 2.8 zooms (Panny 12-35 or Oly 12-40), though one of the fast standard zooms would be my choice ...