Cato1040

Yea, there have been times I'd buy certain things to get into something like astrophotography but don't end up really committing to it. However, I buy almost all my stuff used so I can end up ...

If you're looking for a 24-70mmish lens, the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 is one of the most compact and lightweight, which is why I love it. It's what got me to move from primes to zooms because it's not ...

The IQ from the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 is fantastic IMO. How much of your photography would you expect to be astrophotography related? If it's just something you want to explore but you'd really be ...

With the Canon R6 or Sony A7IV you get those articulating screens. All the major brands are generally switching from their DSLR lens mounts to mirrorless ones. The Canon R5 has a fully articulating ...

If you don't plan on switching lenses, I'd stick with Canon. That is a huge advantage. If you do plan on switching from DSLR to Mirrorless lenses, it would probably be cheaper to switch brands ...

My opinion is that for full-frame mirrorless, I'd avoid all brands besides Canon and Sony. They're the ones I think are most likely to continue pushing out a steady stream of relevant products ...

My opinion: they're both great systems. Sony definitely wins for me because of their value and options for compact lenses (though the 70-200mm is the main exception). However, if money was no ...

I've carried 3 bodies and 4 lenses in a messenger bag and it was doable but not enjoyable. You can try it out and see. A backpack may be better, especially with a 1L bottle.

They're both great cameras and both have IBIS systems. What may be more important are the lenses in the system. Canon has great lenses, but Sony has more options. Especially if you're looking for ...

They are both good options. The Z5 is a fantastic body for the money, but to me, the lens system leaves much to be desired (especially with regards to affordable wider aperture zooms). It's still a ...

Yea. I'd say the extra cost at new prices would make it worth it. The main exception to this is if you can get the G1 version significantly discounted second-hand.

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 (1) One of the cheapest options (2) Great image quality and autofocus (3) Small and light for an f/2.8 standard zoom

Sony or medium format (but I don't think this matters too much nowadays as they're all pretty good) Sony easily with the A7C Sony and Canon Super subjective. They all have their advantages and ...

The bodies are priced similarly, but Sony generally has the cheaper native lenses, especially with all of their third-party support. Plus you probably already have Sony lenses.

The main thing point and shoots offer over smartphone cameras are the lenses, particularly the ability to zoom. I found that I never used my point-and-shoot since my smartphone camera is pretty ...

I'd recommend the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 and the Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8. It would also be easier to transition between the two. If you own a Sigma and Tamron zoom lens, you'll be zooming and focusing ...

A phone. Honestly, without knowing much more about you, it's the best camera for most beginners. A dedicated camera can often cause too many barriers-of-entry to new photographers.

I'd recommend looking at the Sony A7III. Partly because that lens ecosystem with third-party options can be so much cheaper than its competitors. There is also an abundance of used gear available ...

Sorry that happened to you. It's a good reminder for why we should all buy from reputable dealers and/or in-person. (The site doesn't even seem to be operational anymore.)

If you're buying new, I'd recommend spending up for the A7IV. I'd mainly recommend the A7III if you know how to check out a used camera and go that route for the savings. That could be close to ...