Cato1040

I would think the A7RIII with those lenses should last you more than just a couple of years. Weather sealing is a tricky thing as ILCs very rarely have an objective sealing rating. Personally, I ...

The only affordable wide angle lens with autofocus I can think of are Canon APS-C ones. All wide angle lenses tend to be expensive. If you choose Sony, here are some ideas: Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Sony ...

This is a lot of money to spend if you don't fully know what you want/need yet. You are generally correct in that faster is better is more expensive. That being said, f/4 can be good enough, ...

Those are all great lenses. I'll assume you're well enough off to afford all these.

I'd suggest you take a look at Panasonic cameras like the G85.

I pretty much agree with everyone else in saying the RX100V might be your best option. The LX10 is a good alternative, but I'm not sure if the autofocus is as fast, and you'll need fast autofocus ...

The D3300 is already a pretty capable camera for high ISO shooting. If you need higher, you may need to look at 'full frame' cameras, which are much more expensive, especially when you have to ...

Very few people would argue the Z6 is an overall better camera than the A7III. The A7III with a 24-105mm f/4 or Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 are good combos for the camera and would be very capable.

If you can afford it, I'd say the switch is worth it. The A7RIII (or A7RII) combined with the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 can be a good starter setup for your needs. Adding something like a Rokinon 14mm ...

For of all, to clarify, most of the suggestions you put up are not DSLRs, but rather mirrorless cameras. If you're hoping to vlog yourself, having a screen that can fully articulate to face you ...

Technically, the D7500 has better information gathering abilities so technically it can be considered the better one, but others prefer Canon's default colours. The difference would be subtle to ...

The Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 could be a good flexible option.

They are both great cameras, and I wouldn't hold my breath for the D750 replacement. Lens recommendations could be the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2 for the Nikon, or the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for the Sony. ...

If you don't like Fuji RAWs, then I'd avoid them. The Canon R system is a bit of a gamble and probably a few years from having the lenses you want/having more affordable lenses, though you can ...

You're looking at a very expensive genre. Sports photography usually requires long lenses (which can cost more) and night photography usually requires great sensors, fast burst rates, and fast ...

Ok, now I understand, this is quite different than how I first interpreted your concern. I just checked shutter life expectancy for older cameras (http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/) and it does ...

For astrophotography, a fast lens would help. To be flexible, something like the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 could be a good starting place. If you're in the Toronto area, I'm also selling an 18-35mm f/1.8 ...

If you don't need full frame and portability is an important consideration, then I'd definitely push you more towards the Fuji. The system not only lighter, but way more compact. The X-T3 plus the ...

You are entitled to your opinion, but I wouldn't worry about the fact that they were not originally a photography company. I'd say they are as much of a photography company as Canon is, which is ...

Fuji: Your main drawback is image quality, but you seem to like it for everything else. If you can improve your technique to help with that (bracketing, using better exposure settings, using ...