SigZero

Seems like with the R7/R10 Canon is keeping it's policy of reusing old sensors with just a bit of facelifting. I would love to see photonstophotos analysis of those. It seems that it's only R5 and ...

GP-E2 works also with my R5, but I've stopped using it. The BT connected camera app in iPhone is a very convenient and reliable way. I was surprised, because on my Sony cameras It was always trouble. ...

It is important to understand that R bodies support 2 protocols - the EF protocol (used with adapted lenses) and RF protocol used with RF lenses. Of course, currently it is not a problem do design ...

I've just did some testing with 1.5.2 and I think that we are back at 1.4.0 times with object tracking. Seems to be as sticky as all pre 1.5.0 releases. Br, Pawel.

Yes, as humans, animals and vehicles are never my subjects. This worked well on FW prior to 1.5 and since 1.5 this mode is useless as camera is able only to detect those three types of subjects. So ...

Is there any Canon document stating how panning detection works with IBIS. I'm sure that when lens IS detects panning the IBIS has to also adapt for that.. Br. Pawel

I was almost always using EFCS. The planes ware quite fast, around 150km/h. I'm also getting this problem with 24-105 f/4 when using with trains with pretty slow shutter speed. With IS enabled ...

Tried RF 800/f11 with R5 on airshow. This lens definitely does not have panning detection. Most of my panning shots with IS enabled have been ruined (still background with blurred subject). ...

My experience with RF lenses without "2" IS mode is that only way to get panning working correctly is to disable IS at all. I tried with RF 800 f/11, RF 24-105 f/4 and when IS is on, most panning ...

I've tried using initial AF pt. As I wrote - in pre 1.5.0 FW with or without any subject preference selected in menu - the tracking of train front was solid. In 1.5.0 FW with any subject preference ...

Can you please describe your AF setup. I will surely try it. Br, Pawel

R bodies report shutter cycles in thousands. So <1000 is perefectly ok. Don't understand why Canon can't report full count. Br, Pawel

Already mentioned that my subjects are trains and planes. I've decided not to use tracking at all. Back to old single AF point. Seems that with 1.5.0 Canon tracking is crap for me. My both FF Sony ...

Could you clarify where manual says that only supported subjects are people, animals and cars. If this is true, then Canon's AF is ages before Sony's and Nikon's implementation of object tracking. ...

It might be one of mine scenarios. I have assigned "tracking+face" to AF-ON button. When pressed without half pressing the shutter system tries to find object in the scene an track it. But with ...

Because nothing has changed in scope of settings between both FW. The 1.5.0 added the vehicle tracking only as an option in scope of AF. Br, Paweł.

If you do panning with R5 and 100-500 setting IS mode "2" is mandatory. 100-500's IS combined with R5 IBIS will produce such situations if you use mode "1" which does not have panning detection. Br ...

Probably because there are several ways to deliver power over USB-C. If you are taking about USB chargers for charging battery inside R5 then from my experience any charger that is compatible and ...

I think You are right - never used those wide AF modes, but this is obvious that tracking happens only within the selected area not whole frame. I'm only using Face+Tracking mode and before 1.5.0 ...

I think that tracking is available in "tracking" AF mode but also in three wide area modes. In tracking mode, when initial AF point is not not to Auto but one of two other settings you show camera ...