Toni Genes

@VCSD - from E-M1 MARK II measurements :
For ISO-64 DXO measured a manufactured ISO - 83
For ISO-200 DXO measured a manufactured ISO - 83 again.
Do you think you will get the same exposure time...

I think there is missunderstanding about what "manufactured ISO" means.
I also checked dpreview comparison tool and found that all cameras had the same exposure time. There is no cheating from...

Any 4/3 lens will work fine on E-M1 or E-M1 MK II - similar to E-5 or better. The only exception is 12-60mm which was faster on E-5, but still focusing decent on E-M1. On 50-200mm SWD you can mount ...

Everything is possible. Actually it could be that my sample of 50-200mm MK1 had some small faults or small deviations for IQ. I had a friend which had 50-200mm SWD too. He also got nice results ...

Paul, I do not think the optical construction of the 2 lenses is identical. I had both versions of 50-200mm: -with the first one I shot 1 year; -with the SWD version I shot 4 years, because I was ...

Maybe you can replace your EC-20 with an EC-14. EC-14 works fine on 50-200mm MK 1.

From my experience: 1. 50-200 MK 1 + EC-20 it is not fine : very soft at 400mm, a lot of CA 2. 50-200 SWD + EC-20 it's fine. It is sharp at 400mm, ideal to close it to F/9.0. But of course you ...

For me as user, it does not matter if is ISO-200 or IS0-100 underexposed with 1 stop.
If Olympus discovered that ISO-100 underexposed with 1 stop is better than ISO-200 well exposed, I do not mind...

Very nice photos, Vas !

From my experience: -a good video card (GPU) will nearly double the speed (do not forget to activate it in Olympus Viewer); -a much faster processor will increase the speed dramatically - could ...

You need the version with Canon mount + Metabones adapter or other adapters to have autofocus. Nikon version can be mounted too, but it does not have autofocus on M4/3 bodies. Here there some ...

Only 10 days left until official announcement.
So soon we will know all the specifications.

If they make a good camera, they will not have any competition in the next 1-2 years.
It's a great start for Sharp in camera business. I wish them succes whith such ambitious project.

Peter, You do not need that very fast exposure times (ex. 1/10000) for static subjects. 1/500 is more than enough for a static subject and in this way you can maximize the output (lower the ISO and ...

I guess 300mm will be a bit sharper than 150-400mm, but the difference will be negletable. 150-400mm would give you zoom flexibility or very long reach when you mount an teleconvertor on it (560mm ...

A lens like 75-300mm will never be good enough for wildlife. You can make nice photos with it in some situations, but in some other situations you will be frustrated : slow focus, poor IQ when the ...

This year Olympus is celebrating 100 years since the company was founded. As it was rumoured already, this is the main reasons they prepared a lot of nice new products to be released this year. In ...

The main competitor of this camera will be E-M1 MK II which is sold now for 1500...2000$.

So either they make a really performant camera which worths a higher price, either they lower the price.

A performant camera is always a good news.
Until the price&specifications are published, any discussion about "how expensive it is" , is useless.

Does it makes sense an m4/3 PRO sport camera ?
Of...

How much it costs an D5 ?

An m4/3 sport camera which costs only 30...40% from D5 price, makes a lot of sense in my opinion.