rjensen11

Do you mean 100-400? I assume so.

I heard that, too. Of course, they may have purchased (tens of?) thousands of previously manufactured sensors from Olympus, use those, and will focus development on the rest of the security ...

I don't know the sensor manufacturing space. I've only seen references to Sony, Canon and Sharp, but there probably others. Who is going to invest in a shrinking market?

With Olympus's camera strategy unknown at this time, who would commit to the design/manufacturing costs of a new MFT sensor? I think we should appreciate what we have, and not hope to see any ...

You just posted about 200 messages about the incredible benefits of m43 and it's crop factor, and a day later you're going to Sony because of poor EVF performance that was well documented about ...

Please, do not torment with OP with posts like this. It will trigger another five posts  him/her about how stupid you are and 4:3 is better than 4:2.25 or 4:2.67. I wish I was kidding.

Unfortunately, I don't think you will ever let this die...

You can't argue with the math, regardless of what the vendors stamp on the lens or what their zooms says it is. This is the math, for a target 50 ft. away: m43, 12mm lens: Horizontal angle of view ...

I have an em1m2 and a7r3. I understand the difference. Find and FOV calculator on the internet. They're free and easy to use. Then you'll understand. This is like arguing with someone that thinks ...

I think everything has been said multiple times. It's just tedious at this point. This is as bad as equivalence arguments.

I had the same thing happen with my em1m2. Haven't had it happen with my Canon or Sony cameras. When I asked about my em1m2 on this forum six months several folks said they had the same  thing ...

Alan, Nice shot and I really enjoyed your website. A lot of fantastic images. Roger

I agree with the 35 if you have the light to support it. The 20 may have some unflattering perspective if you get too close.

I have the em1m2 (purchased new when it came out) and a7r3 (purchased used on FM). I had the em1m2 for a few years before I got the Sony. I held on to the em1m2 because it was fun to use, and had ...

Why are you reviewing a lens released in 2013 (reviewed lots of times, already), and why does a person who had one post a year ago, suddenly post six lens reviews in a day? Just curious.

I must be missing the point. Did you think they would say "wow, thanks for telling me how stupid I was to buy the gear I bought?"

Why is this an allegation? Are they doing something wrong?

If people only bought what they needed, most of them would have stopped before moving to m43. It seems a bit arbitrary to say m43 is where they should stop buying equipment.

I'm sure I'll get bashed for saying it, but most of the posts on this forum are variations on the same theme, over and over again. It is an echo chamber of the same people making the same ...

I switched to the a7r3 from the em1mii. Very happy with the results. I like the extra resolution, as I  also end up cropping a bit. My favorite lenses, in order: 24-105 (75% of all my pictures), ...