Tuloom

Dope! Looks like every indie album cover in the last ten years. Her photos remind me Big Thief and their incredible music. Same feel.

Stating and repeating the obvious in this sub-forum ---"OMG, it's the person behind the camera!"--- seems to be some sort of prizeless contest of platitudes that never ends.

It has ruined the image quality. The vast majority of presets are over wrought junk. It's like putting some guy who drifts his used toyota in Walmart's parking in the cockpit of an F1 at the Monaco ...

Image quality of your photos has been fair to good up till now. This photo exhibits too much digital-ness to be pleasing (at any size); that is, IQ is a mess due to abusive processing. That should ...

You don't need any of that with your camera. You have an EVF. Look through the viewfinder. You can see exactly what is in focus by zooming in the foreground and background and you can narrow it ...

Don't take my word for it. Please don't. But Please stop using these old film calculators. Use your EVF and magnified view to manually focus. You'll be stunned. At least try it. The pandemic in ...

Umm it's ebay. Standards? Don't buy it. Great lens thought. Get a good copy. It's stunning. Way better than most high end zooms.

It's oversharpened and/or suffering from diffraction. Maybe oversharpened to make up for the diffraction. You definitely did not need anywhere near f/11 for this shot. It's Not over HDR'ed. Set ...

Clean it or... Clone stamp, Content aware fill, Spot Removal tool, Yada Yada Yada.

Yes, but not the one you have.

Heck no.

We should do the same for photos of kids, birds, dogs and landscapes in that order.

Landscapes in focus. I'm gobshocked, like a pedestrian struck by a self-driving Tesla, at the seismic number of blurry landscapes 'round forum parts.

Ecosystems are changing the narrative in today's society. LOLz.

Freaking awesome, Bro.

High quality qualitätswein cat photos with a lot of amazing bouquet are few and far between. Here is a great one. I call this "Through the Looking Grass" Cats photos are certainly better than ...

OP, this is the advice of a real photographer taking actual photos. Bouquet is very subjective. More or less might not be as important, in the end, as what it looks like.

I think a light microscope that uses hybrid digital film would be awesome. :)

About as useless as the old "build quality is bad" from sage oracles who merely hold whatever's in question in their highly calibrated hand, without so much as removing a screw, and expect it to ...

Get past the cute film jingles for digital. They are archaic and meant for analog. Use them for digital photography and you will have poor quality digital files.