DingieM

Joined on May 9, 2012

Comments

Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

IMO it also deserves a comparison with Affinity Photo. Hopefully someday I can swap Windows as main OS with Linux on my ryzen 1700 desktop, and run windows applications and maybe games with VirtualBox or Wine?

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2020 at 05:45 UTC as 21st comment

Lol Twitter and Facebook. Those two including Google are part of the obviously existing globalist deep state a.k. NWO. They are here to censor us into oblivion.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2020 at 20:13 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H 4K sample reel (102 comments in total)

Dat video quality!

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2020 at 07:56 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

Bigsensorisbest: Glad the author is happy but this looks desperate from nikon, I went mirrorless in 2016 and the days of a big mirror flapping about in my camera seem a long long time ago. Just giving Sony even more time to pull ahead, a really sad day from a user who grew up with F2s and F3s....

Panasonic has now some excellent full frame hybrid cameras. There is also Sigma and other competitors.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2020 at 10:39 UTC
In reply to:

Altruisto: If it's anything like firmware 3 for e-m1 mark2 in autofocus, it's really tempting. And for videographers who have a lot of m43 lenses, and who want autofocus, this is truly an excellent option. It has even something that we can't get in firmware 3 of e-m1 mark2, full HD at 120 fps for broll!

The quality and rendering of 4k video's needs to be reviewed. The quality of GH5 footage is significantly better than the E-M1 mark 2

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 09:18 UTC
On article Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III sample gallery (124 comments in total)
In reply to:

fPrime: Pleasant SOOC JPEG colors but too many of these shots look like they would benefit from more 3D separation.

Part of the problem is the unusually deep DOF inherent to Micro Four Thirds cameras, but the other problem is that many of the Olympus optics are over-engineered for sharpness in order to squeeze 20MP of resolution out of the small Micro Four Thirds sensor. This kills off some of the microcontrast.

Use RAW, plenty of details to be recovered. Also in my aging e-m5 the jpeg's are inherently soft

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2019 at 08:54 UTC
On article Nikon Z50 pre-production sample gallery (DPReview TV) (20 comments in total)

Really second

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2019 at 13:21 UTC as 8th comment
On article DPReview TV: Fujifilm X-A7 preview (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

chadley_chad: Those images don’t look great; but that poor buffer just kills it dead! Think the intended market would be better suited with an RX100, Sony A6000 or Canon M6 (MK1 or MK2).

Hey...psssst...it isn't final firmware, like DPReview said

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2019 at 08:40 UTC

I guess the 108mp will be divided into 4 main color layers?

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2019 at 12:57 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

NovakM: 240mp.....
mnmnmnmnohmyghad

Very interesting camera.

What on earth are you going to do with 240mpx?

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2019 at 15:05 UTC

8-bit, 100Mbps 4k video? Meeeeeh

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2019 at 15:03 UTC as 385th comment | 4 replies

Hmmmm....interesting?

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2019 at 10:30 UTC as 154th comment
In reply to:

iAPX: Show us a real-world 64MP pictures taken on a sunny day, not a 2048x1536 twitter pictures or even the 4096x3072 version linked on another comment.
And we don't know how these have been processed: the lack of metadata is troublesome to say the least, as well as the marker on the picture.

Samsung have been caught many time using DSLR pictures to advertise their smartphone's camera IQ...

The same is true for other mobile phone manufacturers

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2019 at 18:29 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy S10+ sample gallery (266 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jrt150: These pictures are so oversharpened. Very disappointing, I had the note 5 and now note 9, both look much better than this. Seems that Samsung's new phone cameras have actually gone down in quality.

I have the Note 9 and seeing too much over sharpening. Very sadly, Samsungs photo app doesn't let us change the sharpening...

Link | Posted on Jun 3, 2019 at 17:05 UTC
In reply to:

Nicolaso: Light, textures even movement look great.

The Troll trailer shows its deficiencies: the human facial expressions are far from being able to replace the real humans... at least for now

@nicolaso The human face has 100 muscles, not thousands. Nonetheless a huge amount compared to other parts. I have training with an optometrist and 15 minutes of facial muscle training can be exhausting.

Link | Posted on Mar 23, 2019 at 06:51 UTC
On article Gear of the Year 2018 - Carey's choice: Panasonic GX9 (305 comments in total)

I am put off by the overall darkness m43rd images get when taken. Its demotivating.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2018 at 22:20 UTC as 21st comment | 5 replies
On article Nikon Z7 Review (4476 comments in total)

Overrated score, not worth the money. Clear as daylight

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2018 at 20:13 UTC as 210th comment
In reply to:

108: I see one true real advantage of all these new phone cameras : holiday pics quality is going to significantly improve on Facebook , which will make it all so much easier to put a like on your best friends' shots without bad conscience...

Are you dominated by the wish to have fakebook likes? Is that your reality?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2018 at 09:30 UTC
In reply to:

Battersea: When will point and shoot or compact cameras feature computational photography in a greater way? Wouldn't a one inch sensor 24-120 compact camera like that be awesome?

They can contain CF when they jack up the price considerably, and nobody will buy them any more

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2018 at 09:28 UTC
In reply to:

ThomasIII: A lot of misinformation here.

Pixel 2 camera sensor size = 1/2.55”.

IPhone Xs sensor size = 1/2.55”.

Pixel 2 camera is NOT better than Xs despite what ONE source said (theVerge).

DxO for Xs = 105.

DxO for P2 = 98.

DxO does NOT test 4k video.

Smart HDR on Xs is active in photo AND video (up to 4k30).

Smart HDR is NOT like Pixel 2 processing. Pixel 2 just controlled the highlights and added lots of contrast to give appearance of details (and lots of noise in low light). Smart HDR in Xs contols the highlights AND bring out the shadow...and has noise reduction both hardware and software.

Eventually, DXO is just a way of testing, not the most objective.

In any case, it will be interesting when they "test" the P3.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2018 at 09:27 UTC
Total: 82, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »