-
Well if the test being posted here that are scientific say the A7RIV is superior im not gonna argue with it. Im just saying to my eyes, it seems the A7IV looks better, especially in the cases of ...
-
Here are just two quick shots I took out the door before I run to the store. I will take proper shots today so we can do a better test. This is not a proper test, although all settings are the ...
-
Yes, I can post something. Let me try to get a sunset or something. I was thinking of doing that this morning anyway. The photos I have so far are mostly stuff I wouldn't post online. lol Just ...
-
I understand the Slog 3 in the A7IV has dual ISO at 3200, I do see that it cleans up when I get to 3200 but what it is ISO 400 in photos right? Because its always x4? But I read my A7RIV is 320 or ...
-
I think you're right but I also think the image quality is just different on the new sensor in the A7IV. The colors, even though in raw seem much different, it has a much more Canon look to it. ...
-
I did a lot of test since the original post. It appears that everyone here is right. The A7RIV is sharper, however the AF seems to be drastically better with eye AF on the A7IV. When doing ...
-
yeah I tried it and I think the a7riv does look better than upscaling the other one. Still useful for prints.
-
Watch this... I tried this... and it did work but my testing is limited, this video is old the new version apparently works better. I just tried it and was amazed. How many of you have tried this? ...
-
Okay I just did a test on a static subject. Here is what I noticed... Didn't notice anymore detail but did notice the sharpness seemed to be exactly the same at 5.6. This is not the case with my ...
-
Interesting, I should try it at 5.6 and see. I read these new ART Sigmas resolved a lot of detail. But you could be right maybe at 1.4 its not resolving more than the 33 megapixel camera, meaning ...
-
Yes, I am shooting Raw. Its difficult for me to believe too. I'm not making it up. It seems like 61 megapixels should have more detail. It has more resolution but not more detail. Is it that the ...
-
I know and I've read that a lot, but it still seems to be applying some with the 61 megapixels or why isn't it as sharp? Or is it just the AF and the processor being that much better in the A7IV? I ...
-
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4622010 This person has the same experience with the A7IV being sharper than the A7Riii, A7Riii being 42 megapixels. Even when comparing at the same image ...
-
Right, but also, if I'm going to have to do that to get the results I want handheld, meaning indoor portraits things like that, I might as well just use the 33 megapixel camera right? And the 61 ...
-
I used 1:1, I should try to do that and see if they are more equal with the same output size. But the reason I have the 61 megapixel version, is I do want it to look really sharp at 1:1. Am I right ...
-
So, as I got the A7IV I realized the AF was better but now I am realizing there are differences in getting sharp photos it seems with double the megapixels. When I had the original A7R and no IBIS ...
-
I have the 24-70 2.8 which means I have 35 2.8, but I am tempted to get the Zeiss 35mm 2.8 because of how small it is. It'd be nice to have a compact system sometimes. What other small lenses are ...
-
I've always heard that you dont want to keep formatting cards all the time and I got some new expensive cards so Ive been just deleting, however formatting works much nicer. Does formatting wear ...
-
The A7iv is such a nice camera, you should really go with that. There are ways to make the buffer faster if you don't mind shooting compressed. Plus the AF system is so advanced is sticks on like ...
-
I have both cameras. I think the A7IV is clearly a superior camera, if you use both of them. The A7RIV image quality is better because you have 61 megapixels but in real world shooting, this might ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
1668 |
Threads started |
175 |
Last post |
5 months ago |
|