Dan_168

For ME personally, $3K for 20MP  camera is not tough to swallow at all, but 3K for a MFT  definitely is.  I have been and will continue to spend that kind of money on a camera body, my first FF ...

it doesn't matter what model that is, as long as it doesn't use the same old dinosaur 16MP sensor and it has a smaller body than my current OMD EM 10 II, I am in.

I have been using multiple system since film days and got into digital  in 2004, Canon 10D, 1D MKk II, 1Ds II....5D....... and been using multiple system/format all these time up until today, ...

Totally agree, get one to play with yourself is better than reading 1000 online review or listen to any internet expert.

First of all, have " great details" is very personal, I have made prints looks like crap but co-worker said it was nice and I said if you are OK with that you can have it it will be scrap anyway, ...

it all depends on what you are comparing it to. it can be great and it can be horrible, all relative. I do own a OMD EM10 II and some other camera from different manufactures, in my opinion shadow ...

I also have the 10-18 for E mount on pre-order so I really wish it will come  in before my Christmas travel. However, i really wish they make the close to useless lens hood removable, or simply get ...

Thanks for the feedback, I do have a Zeiss 35 1.4 Distagon ZE ( Canon mount), this lens has crazy color fringing issue wide open, so I actually treat it like a F2 lens, but of course no such issue ...

I would say OP,  forget about that above statement first. if yo care about the thin DOF, that two stop makes day and night difference. I would. 70-200 2.8 is not that big of a beast, try the 200 F2 ...

That's very true, I totally agree with you. so my own definition of nice sun star would be those sharp, well define one such as what Zeiss Loxia 21 provides, vs those from lens like Sony FE 35 2.8 ...

Sorry which Nikkor are you referring to?

OK, thanks again. so if we say for landscape is " about the same" with either lens, then the additional F1.2 capability seems to give some edge over the F2 max aperture for things like ...

Thanks, I own and love the Loxia 21 so I do understand what " richness" you were talking about. I guess with either lens I will still have to watch out for the edge as both has some degree of ...

Thanks everyone for the feedback, very informative, so far I have not heard anyone commented on the Field Curvature on both lenses, any opinion on this specific area?? Thanks again in advance.

Thanks for the feedback. I owned that Voigtlander Classic 35 1.4 at one point and definitely not the landscape lens I want to own, I got so excited about the announcement of that lens and ...

Thanks for the feedback, I am opposite and kind of don't like that " style" of sunstars and sold mine a while back, mine was not that sharp at the edge , also pretty bad at the 35mm end too, so I ...

For those who own or have experience with both Voigtlander 40 F1.2  and Loxia 35 F2, specifically for landscape, which one do you prefer, strictly optically speaking, size, weight and price not a ...

First all, a few un-boxing video and then followed by few dog pictures and report back here.

Thanks you for the sample !!!

Thanks for your feedback, does the field curvature on the Loxia 35 bother you? I have the Loxia 21 and absolutely love that, exif and electronic contact doesn't matter for me at all though, I am ...