Dan_168

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on Nov 30, 2004

Comments

Total: 78, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Timbukto: That illuminated loupe is so cool. It's a wonder why Canon did such a crappy job at my local service center cleaning up sensors when they have better tools than I have.

yeah, I have been cleaning my own sensor since 2004 so I do know a little bit about sensor cleaning, the statement makes it a little bit more simpler than the real process is. not to mention the dust doesn't always " sit still" and waiting for me to go take it out.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2016 at 20:12 UTC
In reply to:

Timbukto: That illuminated loupe is so cool. It's a wonder why Canon did such a crappy job at my local service center cleaning up sensors when they have better tools than I have.

yeah that Visible Dust sensor loupe with light works really good, it makes sensor cleaning so easy, I use it everywhere, home, hotel, in my car too. I can actually see what I trying to clean with that thing so much easier than holding a flash light.I always have it in my camera bag with a dust blower and a few sensor swab, nice little thing comes in very handy.To be honest, even they offer this service to me for free I wouldn't bother to send it in, it's so easy and only take about a minute or two the most. Wet clean however, takes more time and little more messy though.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2016 at 18:50 UTC
In reply to:

ozturert: Lots of cats eye bokeh, even in middle zones, but bokeh seems very smooth. Pictures are small though.

I was really surprised to see that too.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2016 at 21:40 UTC
In reply to:

AlexCHStudio: Oups.. Highlights on the 3rd picture do not look very attractive... I guess I would rather skip this lens. It does not really add anything into my collection of glass.. Still a terrific piece for those who does not have yet lens of this class.

I kind of agree the Cat Eye Bokeh" can happen on any fast 85/105 1.4 lens to some degree, but this one seems to be on the 'high" side, say compare to the Sony 85 1.4 G master. I notice that on my 85L II and 105 DC very often and kind of annoying that's why I went with the 85 GM instead of the Batis 85 for my Sony system.

Link | Posted on Jul 28, 2016 at 21:27 UTC
In reply to:

thx1138: Hopefully low coma for astrophotography. Also I've read from field tester the distortion is very low and from 5.6 it gives the Canon 11-24 a run for the boatload of money it costs.

Exactly, this will be specifically a Astro lens for me, so I only concern about its COMA looks like. so I have zero interest in the Canon 11-24 no matter how much that is.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2016 at 22:15 UTC
In reply to:

Keith Cooper: I've still got the 12mm f/2.8 lens here for another day or so... so if anyone has any specific questions about it that I've not covered in the review, please do ask? There is a thread for this on the 3rd party lens forum, which has some images and links to the detailed review.

I would be very interested to know what the COMA looks like on this lens, if that's not any worse than the Samyang 14 2.8, I will be the putting in my pre-order as soon as I can.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2016 at 22:08 UTC
In reply to:

Donnie G: Well, if mirrorless really is the future then we can be certain that the future isn't arriving this year, or next, or......
lol... :))

maybe in another 4 more years, LOL.

Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
On article Sony announces FE 50mm F1.4 ZA prime lens (293 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZeneticX: Samyang have a 50mm F1.4 AF that's gonna be priced less than $600

Is the Sony Zeiss gonna be $900 better?

How much better is "900 better"?

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 17:09 UTC
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (516 comments in total)
In reply to:

BigOne: With all due respect, I don't understand why this thing has to be so big and heavy. I could understand it 5-10-15 years ago when electronics were heavy. But in this day and age when everything goes from small to smaller to tiny, is it REALLY necessary to keep the size so Windsor-castle-ish? What IS in this body that takes up so much space? I'm looking at Sony a7's with very similar specifications and I just don't get it why this camera is so insanely huge. I wish someone would disassembe it and prove to me that it's not just "traditional".

If money is not an issue I will pick up a D5 instead of D500 any day, due to just the body style, even everything else being equal, as a current owner of 4 Canon 1-series and previous D3 user, I am not very interested in a small body, even with vertical grip attached to my D300 and 5D, it's not the same, that's why I am not shooting D500 and 5D any more and back to the 1 series. thank god some body still making those big camera not everyone moving to mirrorless. I guess I am old fashion, LOL.

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2016 at 03:54 UTC
On article Looking Sharp: A focus stacking tutorial (222 comments in total)
In reply to:

AlexeyD: A much simpler approach would be to use tilt lens. No fuffing about in photoshop.

Actually between Tilt/Shift lens set up and focus stacking, I found it takes me MUCH LESS time using Tilt/Shift lens and do the correction on the spot than Focus stacking in PP. if you used to this set up procedure, it really take about a minute or two the most to set it up, for anyone serious about quality shot, this kind of set up time is really nothing. in my opinion it's much better way to shoot than using focus stacking, I call focus stacking the last resort only when I don't have the Tilt/Shift lens with me, not to mention the shift feature which is even harder to do with the regular lens + PP.

Link | Posted on May 30, 2016 at 19:34 UTC
On article Looking Sharp: A focus stacking tutorial (222 comments in total)
In reply to:

AlexeyD: A much simpler approach would be to use tilt lens. No fuffing about in photoshop.

Agree, but it's nice to have a alternative for those don't have the luxury to own a Tilt Shift lens. With that being said, TSE 17 and TSE-24 are two of my favorite landscape lens for this exact same reason, I spend an extra minute for set up but I save a lot of time down the road.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2016 at 21:01 UTC
In reply to:

Lan: Executive summary: Centre sharp, but corners soft.

High levels of astigamatism/coma appear to be the reason for the relatively poor showing at the corners; so this is not the lens of choice for astrophotography.

That said the A7R2 is a harsh test for any lens. Based on my experiences on a 5D2, I suspect the Samyang 14mm f2.8 might be a better option, but I haven't tried it on an A7R2...

I haven't have the chance to play with this Voigtlander myself yet but I have been using the Nikon 14-24 and the Samyang 14 for my Milky Way and night sky shooting ( on D800E and A7R II) and I am extremely happy with the Samyang 14, extremely low COMA, fast F2.8, sharp all the way to the corner, it's just perfect for this application, not to mention its price. so I am actually more looking forward to the new AF version of E-Mount Samyang 14, not that I care for the AF portion of it but hoping it's smaller like a regular E-Mount lens rather than just like gluing an adapter to the DSLR version of the lens like that is now. Also the slow F4.5 aperture doesn't help either when it comes to Astro.

I also wish it has a removable hood or even has no hood at all, because I don't use screw-in UV filter for "protection", but I use the square Lee ND, GND, Reversed GND & CPL all the time, so the build in hood makes it difficult even it has a 58mm filter thread on it.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 20:30 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

surlezi: Great abilities, gread IQ, too bad it's not mirrorless !

@Cultured Vulture, I have 3 1- series bodies and D800E also recently purchased an a A7R II, I have to say I agree everything you just said 100%. obviously I am not against the ML as I have a A7R II myself, but after putting the 85 G master on it, it really is not that much smaller than a 5D+ 85L, also the tiny handgrip on the A7R II is real pain when pair with a bigger lens when compare to any decent size SLR, I guess I am not ready to ditch my DSLR yet, not a long time.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2016 at 20:46 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

surlezi: Great abilities, gread IQ, too bad it's not mirrorless !

Thank god that is not a mirrorless !!! but I will have $2000 extra cash in my saving account if that is.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2016 at 19:04 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gesture: Wonder why finally released when Nikon already has D7200? (+D5X00 and D3X00 series).

I shot the D7200 for a weekend I sure understand why there is market for this and glad they actually deliver this new new model.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2016 at 18:55 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1090 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mateus1: If it was mirrorless I would sell all my gear and switch to Nikon. But this baby is too big and heavy.

I am getting it exactly because it's not a mirrorless, thanks god somebody still building DSLRs.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2016 at 18:53 UTC
In reply to:

digitalhecht: Curious how this (presumably) $599 lens would stack up in terms of performance with a Canon 50mm f/1.4 with Metabones Mark IV. Both of the latter could be gotten for roughly the same price used. Though I no longer have it, I always liked my Canon 50.

As a previous owner of the EF 50 1.4, I think it's very difficult to find a lens not vastly batter than it in the market today. that was by far the worst lens I have ever had in my 25 years of photo life.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 21:07 UTC
In reply to:

k1ngkong: Why do we need autofocus on a superwide 14mm? For those fast moving mountains?

Kidding aside, I'm really excited for the possibility of improved corner performance and the ability to use front filters compared to their current "adapted" 14mm with the huge front glass. That thing flares like no tomorrow and is very soft in the corners (probably because it was designed for SLRs and just has a from-the-factory adapter placed on it).

Maybe check with different copy, both my Nikon and Canon mount Samyang 14 is so sharp edge to edge makes my Nikon 16-35 F4 VR looks so bad and I finally sold them, the Samyang 14 I got is as sharp as my 14-24 at te edge, just with a little heavier distortion.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2016 at 20:52 UTC
In reply to:

Hellraiser: well.. it seems it has less noise than d810 at iso6400 even without pixel shift. kinda makes it the best astro or night photography 35mm SLR camera on the market today...

that's exactly what I am planning to use for, currently there is a Samyang 14mm F2.8 K mount already, I am using the exact same lens with the Nikon mount on my D800E and A7R II. it's a great lens for Astro, really low Coma, sharp edge to edge wide open. Also I don't like HDR that much so this sounds like a great alternative, all for $1800, cheaper than buying another good Zeiss or Nikon lens, all I need is another $300 Samyang 14 and I am up and running.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 18:11 UTC
In reply to:

marc petzold: I'd like to see a 35/1.4 or 35/1.8 FE from Samyang with AF.... :-)

Me too, 35 1.4 and 135 F2 would be the one I will put in pre-order right away.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 15:46 UTC
Total: 78, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »