DiffractionLtd

Hey!  Maybe they can dumb-down requirements for university, then you can get out of the janitor's closet?

It's economics.  Features come at costs.  I'd rather they put it elsewhere.  What we do NOT need is just one more cookie-cutter camera.  The latest offerings from Canon and Nikon look like they ...

And socialists are so blinkered in your anti-Americanism.  Talking about biting the hand that feeds you.

The Achille's heel of FF are lenses.  Most can't hack being wide or near wide open and support full resolution and aberration control, especially not with 45mp.  With m4/3rds and good lenses, you ...

Why does a Sony A7RIII cost what it does?  Does anyone really think it costs as much to make as a Nikon D850?  No.  They charge what they need to to make the thing profitable now, or after a few ...

I used to like Corel's Paint Shop Pro because it had a one button dust remover that would leave resolution basically untouched.

You do pay a pixel penalty if you have to switch over to something else other than the sensor's native aspect ratio, but it's not too severe.

Could have been, or they were Canons and I'm off by a year or so.

Garish concepts of Chinese project designers make Las Vegas look dignified.

I once saw a $7.00 garden hose splitter being sold as a photographic sink accessory for $40.00 so, yes, they do tend to lay-on the extra costs.

You realize that's all nonsense, right?  Ask the scientific community why they use sensors in some cases with 23um pixels, despite the low resolution of sensors having pixels that large.  Stop ...

Like all companies with good products, they got bought, by Raytheon I think.

Companies wouldn't resort to such nonsense if stupid consumers weren't fixated on 35mm sensors.

Same with  a 12mp FF sensor versus a 48mp FF sensor.  Pixel size matters.

Going full-speed into chemical manufacturing probably might have been good, but I don't know enough about that business to say for sure.  Fuji went into cosmetics base-component making and ...

Camera companies and divisions don't have the money of the cellphone companies so I won't expect extraordinary advances from them.  I'd love an E-M5III, but I don't expect miracles.  Maybe ...

m4/3rds didn't keep-pace because they SET pace.  Look at all the innovations they perfected which are now used on other cameras.  If they do go to a larger sensor all I hope is that they keep ...

Tough looking outward at the most economically-successful country on Earth while your own country, where you earn less money for the same job and pay more taxes isn't as successful.  I don't know ...

First place I saw them being used institutionally was at a driver accident reporting center in 1995.

Be very interesting if in photo exhibitions the photo captions had ISO, shutter speeds, etc.  I'll be very, very few are ever above 1600 ISO.