Joined on Jun 29, 2011


Total: 1034, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sharp's new 8K camera is $77,000 (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mark Turney: I ordered two 😉.

But you will have to wait 2 years, I ordered all cameras for my porno studios!!!

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 19:51 UTC
On article Sigma's new 16mm F1.4 will cost $450, ships this month (359 comments in total)
In reply to:

bluevellet: That's a reasonable price.

Still not buying it though.

too heavy?

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 12:19 UTC
In reply to:

Earlybird29: The bodies of the Olympus and Panasonic “pro” cameras are now so big together with their pro lenses that I’ve finally decided to ditch my Olympus EM1 MK II and pre-order the new Sony A7R III to get the FF advantage of much higher image quality. After spending the last 5 years with M4/3 and being constantly disappointed with the IQ even from their pro lenses I’m done with it. I also have the FF Leica Q and the different in IQ between M4/3 and FF is like night and day. My gear is going up on eBay and I won’t have any regrets. Sorry folks.

Are you a pro making 3x2metres (approx. 12x8feet) prints???

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 10:46 UTC
In reply to:

Mateus1: Tiny sensor (without PDAF in 2018) in giant and heavy body that equals FF and offers 25% IQ of it? And to pay for it $1700?

I am not mad.

You and me are not customers/target market...

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 10:42 UTC
On article Photo story of the week: Fire and Ice (181 comments in total)

Great one!

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2017 at 21:09 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

Jefftan: if use with MF lens like Laowa 7.5mm F2
better than all 16MP Olympus/Panasonic camera

16MP should not exist in 2017

How much you need for 6"x4" print? 1500x1000px!!!

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2017 at 07:09 UTC

Nice shots!

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 20:14 UTC as 15th comment
In reply to:

The Davinator: Cue all the Leica haters. Just like clockwork.

There are not Leica haters! Just people who can't afford to buy Leica!!!

Link | Posted on Nov 1, 2017 at 06:40 UTC
On article First iPhone X hands-on field test with sample photos (386 comments in total)

Who needs Sony a7RIII now?

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 17:30 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply

Nice picture. Congratulations!

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 10:28 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Mike FL: I was planing to buy NIKON DL18-50 years ago, but SONY did not believe NIKON can make a workable lens such small and such fast. So does NIKON found out late.

Too bad. I liked NIKON DL18-50, but NIKON can not make the lens work.

We all had high hopes for DL compacts!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2017 at 19:47 UTC

Seems Nikon employs idiots only, otherwise they wouldn't be closing factories!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2017 at 19:44 UTC as 115th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

ChapelThrill23: I'd rather see a 16/2 or 2.8 from them. I like small and light primes to pair with a light compact body.

We all do but for bragging rights there are heavy weights like this one!

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2017 at 20:38 UTC
On article Hands-on with Zeiss Milvus 25mm F1.4 (119 comments in total)
In reply to:

Franz Weber: Is that a Zeiss Milvus in your trousers, or are you just happy to see me?

We all hope it's Milvus...:)

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2017 at 20:34 UTC
In reply to:

Ed Overstreet: I own the Panasonic Leica 15mm f:1.7 for my Lumix G85 and GX8. It's a fantastic lens optically, very versatile, and a lot of fun to work with. As others have noted, it's smaller and lighter than this Sigma monster (for MTF format anyway). This Sigma is almost 3x the length and nearly 4x the weight of my 15mm, and it doesn't focus quite as close either (25cm instead of 20cm) . The extra half-stop of aperture is nowhere near justification for that size and weight difference for MFT, not at any price IMO.

I cashed in all my Nikon and Sigma gear several years ago for MFT-only, because for what I do, there is no IQ difference that matters a damn to me between MFT and either APS-C nor full-frame, and I am no longer interested in struggling with the bulk and weight of those other formats. I'm not everyone, and everyone isn't me, but I think Sigma is nuts if they think they're going to make any dent among MFT users with this lens.

Right on!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2017 at 17:38 UTC

Should be called Dumbbar...

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 17:36 UTC as 69th comment

Great for bokeh lovers, but not for me...

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 15:09 UTC as 15th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

vinrouge0: It will be interesting to see if Panasonic do announce an LX 200. It will have a smaller sensor but a faster more versatile lens with the addition of 4k video. None the less, this is a great camera from Canon despite its shortcomings

Unless they start using the whole m4/3 sensor (and built in flash!) no interest here!

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 18:37 UTC
In reply to:

citrate: That is impressive!

almost, the battery sucks...mkIV vill have f2.8-4.0 lens and battery for 1000 shots, and the launch price? $999,00

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 18:34 UTC

Great job Tamron!!!

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2017 at 16:38 UTC as 10th comment
Total: 1034, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »