wpstl

My post wasn't rude or hostile or any such synonym. The people on this forum tend to focus on Sigma cameras so I suggested the poster try a forum where he might get more help. I even said as much. ...

Considering the Sony 70-200 isn't all that great, I hope it's better than 90% of the Sony.

This forum is for Sigma cameras, not lenses, so you might not be reaching an audience. Try Canon or Third Party Lenses forums.

Not really relevant to the discussion of best landscape camera as few landscape photos are taken at 1.4

$15 is too expensive? https://www.ebay.com/itm/264635035990?epid=1161918851&hash=item3d9d7a3156:g:AEoAAOSw-qleR3kR These adapters allow you to change the aperture on G (aperture ring-less) lenses. ...

At a minimum, it’s inaccurate. “Indians” are people from India.

I would agree had he not mentioned it happened to a different lens. That seems like a more serious issue.

He said he has the 2D version, not the 2d/3d version of the lens so your point is moot.

I have the RX10 III and I never shoot it higher than ISO 800. In my opinion, the 1" sensor loses too much when you get higher than that.

What don’t you like about X Trans?

It means exactly that. Non-DN lenses mirrorless lenses are DSLR designs modified for use on mirrorless. DN are brand new designs made with mirrorless in mind.

This is a forum for Sigma cameras. You might get more help in a Nikon forum.

You'll get blurry images with stabilization on when mounted on a tripod with this lens. Maybe you need a new tripod.

OSS should be off when mounted on a tripod.

You have to do what it tells you to do-control it from the lens.

Galen was known for carrying small, light lenses vs. top of the line gear heavy gear.

I check eBay sold listings to gauge what people are paying for used gear. People can ask what they want but it's what it sells for that matters. If you are in the US, KEH has a 50-200 in EX ...