Dan DeLion

Lives in United States Billings, USA, MT, United States
Works as a Photographer
Joined on May 6, 2008

Comments

Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (216 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozturert: Have they underexposed by 5EV and then balanced the exposure? That is the new fashion in internet, you know...

ozturert - Under exposure, to protect highlights, may be new to you, but photographers have been doing it since the 1950's. You might remember the OLD rule. - With positive film expose for the highlights but, with negative film expose for the shadows. This rule is specifically made for the differing DR's of the two types of materials. You might study this sort of thing, before making comments.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 16:55 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (216 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camera Newton: The point people love to make is, if you are a terrible photographer and often do dumb things like under expose images by 5EV, there are better sensors. For everyone else this camera in real life viewing situations will do as well as any thing else on the market.
So for those who say they need something else with a 'better' sensor, we know the REAL reason why. :)

Camera Newton - What you say is true if you never step out of your studio where lighting ratios are carefully controlled. But, if you go outside. - That's where you need high DR. You can easily confirm that with your spot meter.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 16:42 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (216 comments in total)
In reply to:

Balooziggy: DXO is clearly biased as are many others including DPReview. Canon will never better Nikon or Sony in some peoples eyes, but who gives a sheit? I am using the 1dxII and love it, it's a superb camera albeit not perfect!

So Max iso - I'm happy to hear you never had blown highlights and dead black shadows. It is there that High DR makes a difference.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 16:34 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (216 comments in total)
In reply to:

melgross: Mentioning that the canon is number 21 in the scores seems silly, as all of the top cameras in the chart which compare to it are at about the same level, either slightly higher, or lower. We need to compare like to like.

Then compare the Canon to the Nikon D750's score of 93.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 16:28 UTC
On article DxOMark confirms Canon EOS 1D X II sensor advances (216 comments in total)
In reply to:

melgross: Oh, I also wanted to say that most of the fifferences between sensors in dynamic range and noise are mostly seen in on screen pixel peeping. When making prints, most of the differences disappear. When doing 4 color printing, they go away completely.

Today's digital files are way better than what the best film had to offer. I ran a commercial film lab in NYC for some time. We had the worlds only pro Kodachrome processing line. Cameras have gotten so good in recent years that these differences have exceeded physical media.

Actually, the higher dynamic range will clearly show in the detail of the highlights and shadows. Glad to see Canon catching-up in DR for their otherwise fine bodies and lenses.

Link | Posted on Jun 30, 2016 at 16:27 UTC

Three good reasons not to buy third party lenses! Canon, Nikon, Sony…, are under no obligation to make future changes compatible with past third party lenses. In fact so doing could inhibit the manufacturer’s introductions of advanced technologies. So, if you buy a third party lens you take your chances. Canon owners can certainly can complain about Canon’s ever changing lens mount that prohibits the use of past Canon lenses on current Canon bodies.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2016 at 20:14 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On article Setting new standards: Nikon D5 Review (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

johnschafer: I'm sorry, but I'm at the point where I'm done with DPR's very obvious Nikon bias. I really don't want to start a negative rant here. But come on, honestly, I must protest. DPR admits in a separate article of the D5's lowest base ISO dynamic range of any current FF Nikon DSLR. Further, look at FStoppers review of the D5. It is very clear to see the D5 hits its useful limit at ISO25600. Here at DPR if this was a Canon-equivalent pro DSLR, it would be demoted to Silver award. Further, DPR hasn't reviewed a Canon 1D-series in 6 years. Nikon D5 is a Silver award, nothing more.

Why did DPR take 2 years to review the D810? There's bias!

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (1083 comments in total)

Will it take two years to get a full DPR review? We had to wait two years for the D810 review. Probably because it put all the other brands to shame. But after two years some of the other brands don’t look quite so bad compared to the Nikon product. The delayed reviews are like a safe-space. – Nobody’s feelings get hurt.

Link | Posted on May 20, 2016 at 22:22 UTC as 183rd comment | 2 replies
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dan DeLion: Once again DPR shows the value of their scores. It’s amazing how much difference there is between DXOmark and DPR scores. But, it is important not to offend any brand.

BTW – The new white background is a great improvement.

a777 - Maybe I should give up trying to enlighten you? I’ll try again. I make a very nice living doing location photography (mags, industrial, aviation, property, and a few ships.) My camera body criterion are: 1) DXOmark score, 2) DR, 3) ergonomics. These are the criterion that are important to produce salable pics.

Based on these criterion I own: D800E, D810, and 2 D750’s. Plus about 30 Nikkor lenses. Also lots of Hassy stuff.

Now ask yourself this, would you produce better pics with a D800E (DRP score 82) or with a Canon 80D (DRP score 84.)

– End of story.

Link | Posted on May 11, 2016 at 22:04 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)
In reply to:

endofoto: Raw DR is better than Nikon D5 and Cenon 5DSR, however Nikon D7200 has better DR than 80D. This shows that crop sensors are surpassing full frames in terms of DR, which is most difficult to achieve in a smaller sensor. Tthis test shows that we dont need to upgrade to FF cameras and change all the lenses for better quality. For 1K you get better DR than 6K cameras.

Delusional!

Link | Posted on May 10, 2016 at 16:39 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dan DeLion: Once again DPR shows the value of their scores. It’s amazing how much difference there is between DXOmark and DPR scores. But, it is important not to offend any brand.

BTW – The new white background is a great improvement.

A777 – You need to work on your reading skills. I said: “the first thing I look at” not the only thing. There can be lots of reasons to buy a second rate camera, but what are the reasons to give it a Silver Award when other cameras, in its class, have better DR, Res, AF, AE, FPS, and ISO? I’ll tell you why. DPR doesn’t want to lose their Canon readers. The same goes for all the other brands that DPR reviews. Think about this. The Nikon D800 received an 82 score the reviewed 80D got an 84, and the Sony A6300 is only one point better at 85. Those scores don’t make sense to me. Now go over to DXOmark and see how they rated those three cameras.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2016 at 18:47 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)

I wonder how Canon could have fallen so far behind Sony or Nikon. Ten years ago Canon was a leader in digital photography, now the best DPR can say is that the newest Canon is better than the previous Canon. What happened?

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 14:37 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)
In reply to:

mostlyboringphotog: "...and then brighten the resulting (dark) Raw image selectively in post, protecting highlights that are now preserved because they weren't clipped to white due to the higher amplification of an elevated ISO setting."
Something seems got lost in the translation - why would anyone increase ISO beyond clipping the highlight, unless the shadow detail is (far) more important than the blown highlight?
And con - less DR than competition Pro - better DR than older model? Did I get that right?
"It offers the best dynamic range of any APS-C Canon camera to date..." but not as good as other brand? Am I getting this right?
Silver and 84%? What did I miss?

For my shooting, both the highlight detail and the shadow detail are important. With cameras with high dynamic range (such as the D750 or D810), one should expose for the highlights (just as with slide film) and then process for the low values. With above Nikon cameras there is no visible loss in the high or low values until ISO 6400. Also on the above cameras, Nikon has a specific metering mode (center exposure*), that does exposes for the highlights automatically.

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 18:17 UTC
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (689 comments in total)

Once again DPR shows the value of their scores. It’s amazing how much difference there is between DXOmark and DPR scores. But, it is important not to offend any brand.

BTW – The new white background is a great improvement.

Link | Posted on May 3, 2016 at 17:35 UTC as 37th comment | 6 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dan DeLion: Even dpreview’s own data doesn’t support their ratings and conclusions. On the image quality page of this review compare the a6300 to the D7200. The resolution at ISO 100 is comparable with a very slight edge to Nikon (see the resolution chart at 44 and 50.) At higher ISOs the Sony has more noise (compare any part of the dark background at ISO 6400.) In addition, the a6300 has terrible ergonomics, can’t be trusted to shoot 14 bit stills, overheats, has terrible battery life, and has a third rate menu system. How then can the Sony be rated at 85 (Gold Star) and the Nikon at 84 (Silver Star?) Apparently dpreview doesn’t examine their own data.

ET2 - You obviously don’t get it. Just go to the “image quality” page and look at what I mentioned. If you can’t see the difference, you’ll be happy with the Sony! BTW - I don’t own a D7200 or 7100 or 7000. I simply object to dpr’s rating system.

Link | Posted on Apr 10, 2016 at 19:10 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)

Even dpreview’s own data doesn’t support their ratings and conclusions. On the image quality page of this review compare the a6300 to the D7200. The resolution at ISO 100 is comparable with a very slight edge to Nikon (see the resolution chart at 44 and 50.) At higher ISOs the Sony has more noise (compare any part of the dark background at ISO 6400.) In addition, the a6300 has terrible ergonomics, can’t be trusted to shoot 14 bit stills, overheats, has terrible battery life, and has a third rate menu system. How then can the Sony be rated at 85 (Gold Star) and the Nikon at 84 (Silver Star?) Apparently dpreview doesn’t examine their own data.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2016 at 23:23 UTC as 84th comment | 12 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)

How about different ratings for different levels of photographic knowledge? You could have four different levels of skill: 1) Neophyte, 2) amateur, 3) advanced amateur, and 4) professional. For the a6300 the ratings might be:

Neophyte – 20

Amateur – 85 (gold star)

Advanced amateur – 60

Professional – 35

That way you could give out a gold star to practically every camera or lens you reviewed. So what if you eliminate standards of performance and handling, everyone would be happy. These rating numbers and stars might seem arbitrary and capricious, but that wouldn’t be much of a change for dpreview.

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2016 at 19:04 UTC as 88th comment | 8 replies
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dan DeLion: Fascinating to see that dpreview finds this Sony APS-C camera superior to a D750 or a D810. I don’t believe many other reviewers would come to the same conclusion. Does dpreview not want to offend Sony owners with the real facts? Does dpreview receive monies from Sony? Are dpreviews even worth reading? - It now seems that in order to get an accurate review one has to read between the lines. The a6300 has terrible ergonomics, can’t be trusted to shoot 14 bit stills, overheats, has terrible battery life, and has a third rate menu system. How does putting all those faults together yields a superb camera?

Overall rating of 85 v 82 v 84. Or do those ratings have no meaning?

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2016 at 18:18 UTC
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2136 comments in total)

Fascinating to see that dpreview finds this Sony APS-C camera superior to a D750 or a D810. I don’t believe many other reviewers would come to the same conclusion. Does dpreview not want to offend Sony owners with the real facts? Does dpreview receive monies from Sony? Are dpreviews even worth reading? - It now seems that in order to get an accurate review one has to read between the lines. The a6300 has terrible ergonomics, can’t be trusted to shoot 14 bit stills, overheats, has terrible battery life, and has a third rate menu system. How does putting all those faults together yields a superb camera?

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2016 at 17:39 UTC as 90th comment | 11 replies
On article Ultra-compact: Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II review (546 comments in total)

If you don’t like the shortcomings of this camera, wait 12 months for the next version. And wait another 12 months for the improved next version. By that time the reviewed version will sell for $500. Sony needs to spend a lot more time designing and beta testing its cameras so that they get it right the first time.

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 16:03 UTC as 54th comment | 2 replies
Total: 52, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »