Swerky

Does the R6 seem to have a beefier grip than the R5? If so, why? Canon is expecting sports and wildlife shooters to prefer it over the R5 and use with heavier telephoto lenses? It’s a good thing...

Not if I can sell it for a good price. And if I can’t, no regrets. :) still have to see how that Canon is optically. The Voigtlander is sweet!

This looks like a direct competitor to my Voigtlander 90mm F3.5 APO-Lanthar SL II which includes a close focus lens giving it similar macro capabilities. It's waiting to be mounted on a body. The...

All of this looks great. I was expecting better battery performance but fine. Still have to carry at least two batteries. We can’t program the rate button to control white balance or drive for...

Haven’t gone through all the images but haven’t seen the RF 24-105 stm used. It should have been there to see its optical quality. Specially since it’ll be offered as a kit with the camera. Apart...

Given the circumstances I guess it would make sense. The R is cheaper now as well. The R6 has the extra joystick but I find the touch and drag on the screen perfectly usable and quicker. When it ...

https://www.canonrumors.com/here-is-the-canon-eos-r6/ R6 with the RF 24-105 stm mounted. I said it once and will say it again. Does the R6 looks kinda "chubby" compared to the R5? It does have more ...

Being picky, but that new design looks kinda off to me. Not as good looking as the DSLRs. The R5 is a bit better. Not sure wether there would be much use for the joystick with the touch and drag ...

Ok, after Panasonic started it, manufacturers are jumping on the ultra wide angle to normal zoom lens formula. Although 8-25 (16-50 full frame equivalent) is more extreme. Who's next?

I agree with all of the above. And to think that today, for 1000$, one can get, as a travel and family camera, either the rp with 24-105 stm kit or the G1X mark III.  Won't get into comparisons ...

When I first saw the article on the main page, I mistook it for a fixed lens G1X mark III kind of camera. A dslr style LX100 with fully articulated screen. But no, it's an entry level MILC focused...

If by landscape you mean an ultra wide angle lens, the one that suits your description the best is the Tamron 17-35mm F2.8-4 Di OSD for EF mount. As a prime there's the Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM. ...

True. It is different for manual focus lenses as turning the focus wheel induces movement and then have to keep very still. And at f1.2 you rarely need the stabilisation unless shooting in really ...

You have quite an extensive system for a non pro. If you had the RP, perhaps there’d be room for reasons to upgrade. But the R, and a non pro, not so much. And you don’t require a fast burst rate ...

It's not a specialised camera. It's a general photography, rugged, take everywhere tool that outputs great image quality. The G5X Mark II for example, though it has a much smaller sensor than the ...

Hi. The butterfly shot. Is that a crop? Waiting for my G1x mark III to arrive and was wondering about the practical close focus ability. Thanks.

Truth be told, the RP would be 'enough' for my basic needs. But, I also have two manual focus lenses waiting to be mounted on a body. The R6 with its ibis would give them extra good use. Plus I ...

On another note, if you press the playback button yourself, does the camera take time to display the image?

Good to know. Was it a v60 or v90 card you used? Speaking of the internet I looked those cards up and saw a considerable price difference between the two, all other specs similar. Made a search ...

The RF lens obviously looks sharper and offers more contrast.
People get on the debate of who would buy such lenses. Enthusiast vs pro. I happen to have an acquaintance who got himself the EF 85mm...