camcom12

I 'mirror' your thoughts too. No way is CaNikon going to limit their investments to a nitche audience only. They will need both: excellent primes and decent zooms. Perhaps they can hold back on...

Agree.  The 12-60mm & 75-300mm are very easy to carry about, with any of the u4/3 bodies.

Very good points. I have both APSC & u4/3. I love to carry u4/3 with me but often use APSC for slightly better color rendition, etc. Except for Sony, CaNikon offers way too many 28-2XXmm equiv. ...

I think you have the right idea. Including copyright problems, this tool might be used for deceptive purposes, by questionable media outlets, and who knows what else. Perhaps Google's legal team...

It's been said previously, but I'll re-iterate: Since this camera may occasionally find itself in smartphone-hostile circumstances (and if there's any camera that truly deserves it) it really...

Yup, caught my ear also. Perhaps he meant
"24 MegaNickels" ? ($1.2 Million).

Yup. Or, since you mentioned APS-C, a new, compact 16-160mm or re-tooled 16-300mm for E mount would be nice too.

Not sure this is recently new in DPR's reviews but I particularly like the "In Use" section and moving the Specs to the appendix.

I did not look at any EXIF data but I assume you are using spot focus or focus tracking. That said when virtually all superzooms are maxed out to 200mm or 250mm or whatever, the IQ usually drops ...

Sorry to change gears here but a friend who owns top notch DLSRs uses a Sony AX-series Handycam for most of his 4K video. He can virtually "run" with it handheld and get pretty decent & steady ...

Upgraded from A6000 to A6300 to get faster AF, better viewfinder, 4K, best battery life, and cheaper. Found a nice used one on ebay which sweetened the deal. Get A6500 for IBIS if you use ...

Not blasphemous at all, but certainly "embarrassing" ! Why? So a group of us are out in the forest taking pictures. I bring a Dslr and someone else has a Pixel. A few days later we each post a some ...

JohnNEX: Very credible points, especially on lens sizing. Sony E APS-C was intended to be a compact system, relative to FF. It's competition is essentially micro 4/3 & Canon M, not necessarily the ...

Thanks for the list of APS-C E-mount. The Sony 85mm is FF.

@thermidor. True, but note Sony's 16-70mm f/4 approaches that territory reasonably well, though it's a small compromise of course. Except for Fujifilm, it seems APS-C lenses have become somewhat of...

And FWIW (not very much actually), Fujifilm X-E1/2/3 bodies weight less than Sony A6300/A6500 bodies:
X-E1/2/3 - 350/350/337 grams
A6300/6500 - 404/453 grams
So there.

+1

DPReview's reason for the tilting EVF, from the 'Body & Handling' page:

"...the EVF tilts upward 90°, which the street photographers in the DPReview office appreciate."

OK, Bob's your uncle.

Sadly most of the the X-E2s kits & bodys are not available new from dealers anymore. However they are a bargain on ebay in the $275-$350 range.

@Androole, +1. It's in a somewhat different class, but I have the pocketable Sony HX-90V with the pop-up viewfinder. While it's decent, the pop-up EVF really becomes cumbersome (or "fidily")...