camcom12

+1.

Good points but where are the smartphones that truly replace APSC or 4/3 now? They should be here by now. It comes down to controls. Those who need larger sensors want more physical controls &...

@matthew - perfect. Best comment. But then it probably degrades into harassment, contract breach, false representation, you name it.

Agree. One of the reasons I was anticipating this model. Looks doubtful now, or maybe just settle with an XE2s.

Looks fantastic but surprised Nikon is only offering a 17mm eyepoint on the viewfinder. I guess at this level users are not expected to be wearing eyeglasses. It can be a consideration, especially...

@Robert + PM: Agreed.
A 15-200mm or a 14-150mm would be handy. However the phrase "diminishing returns" comes to mind, as a 14-1XX might cut into true wide-angle zoom sales (10-20, 12-24 etc). On...

@Tonio. You may be correct, but Sony offers quite a few 16-XXmm APS-C models:
16-50mm E f/3.3-5.6
16-50mm A f/2.8
16-70mm E f/4
16-80mm A f3.5-4.5
16-105mm A f3.5-5.6
So a 14-50mm could be in the...

I think eventually we'll start seeing 14-50mm (and higher) for the APS-C market. In the 2000's we got 18-200mm; the 2010's got to 16-XXXmm and as we approach the 2020's it should reach down to...

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM ?

10. Faster Live View AF.
Personally I like GPS too, but I know most don't care.

@goative/Mateus1: In some agreement here, but only in two cases:
1) landscape shots where there is green foliage or trees in the background. For some reason, distant green foliage seem to have a...

DPR: While you are running this evaluation, pop on the Panasonic 12-60mm f/3.5.-5.6 for just a half-dozen images or so, right along side this f/2.8-4.0.
(I realize this is easier-said-that-done,...

It's a publicity stunt by Pita (intentionally misspelled), nothing more. And this isn't a cruelty case, at all. What's worse is the often moronic 9th District Court of Appeals will probably side...

@justme, +1.

I have commented on that very issue too. Hopefully it's fully solved in thier dslrs soon. Nikon 1's seemed to work quite well.

I think the "1" is gone, too costly. My bet on 1 in. is they go head-to-head with the Sony RXs & Panny FZs by revamping the defunct DL line. Also Nikon will offer an APSC body, to compete with...

All good points but if they price it like the "1" series was, it will flop just the same. It has to compete with their own D3x00, D5x00, and Fujifilm & Sony mid range offerings.

+1.

All fine points. However if someone really wants/needs a certain new feature or performance improvement, then upgrade. I really like tilting/articulating rear LCD screens. So I've been 'stuck' with...

"Alas, I wish that Nikon would improve autofocus in live view (PDAF on sensor) -- but not if it would compromise image quality."
Indeed my wish too; faster LV focus would be especially useful with...