Ad12

I've got the t7i with the 17-50 2.8 sigma. I'm very happy. I used this as my everyday combo in India bouncing around on tuk tuks and the like - was perfectly fine. In the evenings wide open with a ...

I took a 10-18mm, the 17-50 f2.8, and the efs 55-250 with me to India. It fit in a small case around my waist the camera very easily, didn't really notice it. The 55-250 is a very light lens ...

It depends what you want though. It depends if you want the wide aperture through the range or not, the 15-85 is slower. Also another very important point, the 15-85 is about £600-650, the 17-50 ...

The corners, as with a lot of lenses, are softer than the centre. But I wouldn't agree the corners are very soft from my experience. Of course at the widest point of 17mm is relatively weaker than ...

The 77d/800d share the same 45pt cross type auto focus system as the 80d. One of these three probably more suited to action I would have thought.

I have an 800d (same AF system as the 80d) and love the 17-50. Little heavy compared to the kit lens, but very manageable. To give you some context for travel I took the 800d and the sigma 17-50 as ...

Hello I'm not an expert or anything, but I too had the same dilemma not long ago. I went for the 800d(t7i). Its basically the 77d without the top LCD and one control wheel and the bulb button. Same ...

After researching and also waiting for my bank to fill back up, I've come to a few options finally. Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 VC USD (discounted 400 sigma as no tripod ring available) Pro's: - ...

So a second suggestion for the none L. I will check it. I also asked the above poster just now about if it has or I need IS. I will read about the L vs none L versions. Any thoughts on focal ...

Good idea to check the EF none L. Is it also image stabilised like the L? The EFS 60mm isn't stabilised though. Not sure how important IS is for macro.

I have an 800d, and have varied interests so have expanded my lens collection. Currently use an 800d, 17-50 2.8 sigma, EFS 55-250, EFS 10-18, and a used EF 50mm 1.8. I am pretty much covered here, ...

Hi, thanks!  400mm on my crop would be the 35mm equivalent of 640mm on a canon. Full frame wildlife shooters I wouldn't imagine have anymore reach than that. If the 640mm equiv is short - what is ...

Thanks for the responses. It seems I am showing my inexperience here! When I said faster lens I was referring to wider meaning I can use a faster shutter speed in relatively lower light than a ...

I was curious about one thing actually. The nifty fifty 1.8 STM is faster than my sigma lens, but doesn't have OS. Ignoring the versatility of the zoom especially on crop, if we compare the prime ...

I came back to this. I didn't change my requirements, but spent my lens money on a trip to india! Anyway, i was reading a magazine and saw the Tamron 100-400 was highly recommended for canon ...

I thought i should report back in case anyone else is in the same boat. I got a sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS. Very very happy with it. 17mm is only 1mm wider so might sound silly but I really enjoy the ...

I guess us younger photographers (in the sense i only started this year) don't know how good we've got it! I know this isn't a thread of one stop shop for India processing, but I find it difficult ...

Very interesting responses and comments after my trip, thanks! With regard to the processing, the issue I find with shooting raw is that I have to try and remember how the light was, the tones, WB, ...

HI all thanks for the advice. I'm back. It was a shock at first, i was afraid to use even the compact. After the first week i was happily snapping away with the DSLR and each of my three lenses ...

good advice thank you. I feel the 17-50 may be a bit limited as only one lens. Maybe I could half my 4 and take 2 as a middle ground and no tripod.