Ad12

i have a z6. I love it. The high ISO is amazing. Great ergonomics and a top lcd that Canon wont offer in the price range. However, i was disappointed with the AF for fast moving smallish birds - ...

Raw. The Z6 is my first FF camera though. It blew me away the iso performance. I cant comment on the other cameras i mentioned from personal experience. I have a z6 and d500.

I agree. I use the d500 if things move or i need reach. If ligjts low or i am not looking for a an action shot, the z6 with ftz provides superior IQ. Ive taken shots at ISO14-16000 that look ...

Exactly what i did. I moved to nikon with a z6 and ftz only. But the z6 in latest firmware was not up to getting shots of puffins shooting by me. The d500 made it easy, almost took the sport out ...

Hello i have experience with the same subject. Animal AF worked well for not moving dogs, but i tried my z6 with latest firmware with both a 70-300 (the later one) and the sigma 100-400 with small ...

Id be very interested too.
Naively, i never understood the differences in the prices and the feature sets. Same for the lenses. Why are the cinema lenses so much? I am sure it is justified, i am...

I used my z6 for this but got very frustrated with small fast subjects. It was possible but a pain. Grabbed a used d500 and the keeper rate is night and day improved. The only thing I do miss is ...

Haha. No no. D500 is for wildlife outings only. I used to have more lenses for other systems, but this trip i took z6 24-70. I did also take but didn't use, an ftz and sigma 100-400, in case i ...

I need wider sometimes, rarely longer, but the MK1 Z6 which I purchased on low shutter counts for £900, despite prices now being much higher used, is such a good camera. The AF for action is ...

I think your summary is overly dramatic, but despite loving the ergonomics and the interface, i also eventually moved away from Fuji mostly due to the sensor. But its a personal preference i guess....

I tested the 70-300 AF-P and a sigma 100-400 C side by side. I felt the 70-300 was a touch sharper on the subject, but the rendering I didn't enjoy. The Nikon had busier bokeh in transition. The ...

Sorry to lose focus on the topic slightly, but practically, does the native ISO 64 offer notable improvements over a Z6 base ISO for landscape in high dynamic range environments? Obviously the ...

Hello! I have a Z6 with 24-70 f/4. I adore this lens. It is light, super sharp and somehow immune to lens flare. However, i've started more and more finding myself inside cathedrals and old ...

Hello! Not a particularly useful post for many i'd guess, but I wanted to just share my thoughts. The D500 AF keeps amazing me compared to what I've been used to. I've never had high end AF cameras ...

How about an m6ii with a prime? good value used and 32mp. Also very small. I hear the 32mm 1.4 is a good lens. I can't think of anything as small and sharp with that resolution you may just miss ...

I was unsure if I should get a D500 to supplement my z6 as I really was not getting what I wanted for small birds in flight. I was concerned a D500 milc would be released soon. I am now very very ...

Indeed. I was a bit frustrated upon review. I should have zoomed out a touch when waiting. that said, im happy i got some usable shots. Lesson for the future.

Hello! Had a good day of photography yesterday. Swallows feeding (highlight!, never seen before), barn owl hunting, plus other things and some landscape. I'm very happy I moved to Nikon. The two ...

They went up. I got mine for £900 on about 5000 shutter count. I even saw Argos in the UK selling one clearance for £725….   Now the used Z6i is £1100 from what I can see. I could make money I’d ...

Thanks for the comments all! I actually have the whole series in 10fps shots, but I can't really figure out how to portray it. I know some people do kind of panoramic images with the images cropped ...