Henrik Herranen

According to the Canon RP press release, Canon has reached the milestone of 140 million EOS/RF/Cinema lenses broduced as of December 2018. Canon has been kind enough to offer this information for ...

Hmmh, I just happened to find the following comment in another discussion thread. Might this be your "not available" issue? quiquae: "Currently, if you map the M-Fn bar to "Auto ISO," it returns an ...

Strolic: And from where would you get the light for your EG-S on the "analog R"?
Hints: 20 mm flange distance, no mirror.

(ok, there were already two answers so I removed my redunt message.)

Cowbell?

I quite agree.

That was fast! (title corrected less than five minutes after the remark)

TheDarmok74: Are you sure there aren't some of the same people behind it?

Even though the original and main Nokia mobile phone camera development department has been shut down a couple of years...

HMD Global.

Stop the press! Typo alert in title: "The PureView trademark is now owned by HDM Global".

It's HMD.

That's what you get for using adapters.

Neither does Canon necessarily need to fix anything. This is most likely caused by using an adapter. They can - and do - cause similar effects because of instead of one contact between the camera...

Giggle...

Actually, they didn't work 100% by the book:
"Another stock photo agency informed USPS in March 2011 that its Forever Stamp featured an image of the replica statue rather than the original work....

Hello! There have been many theories here, and the correct one is the "pollen / dust / droplets on top of the lens / filter". This has nothing to do with the viewfinder, or sensor, or flaring, or ...

All right, then everything seems to be in order - except that DPreview copied and pasted the impossible numbers without asking themselves "how come?"

Well, with a 72 mm filter thread it is physically impossible for the lens to be a 75mm f/0.95, because the smallest theoretical front element diameter would be 75mm/0.95 = 79mm. And, as can be seen...

Lars Rehm: I think "640 x 380 pixel resolution" should read "640 x 480 pixel resolution".

Except that the premise of the article is flawed. They start by claiming CR2 is uncompressed, which just isn't true.

"Compressed RAW..... The ultimate oxymoron of 2018!!"

This is incorrect - just as the whole premise of the article, BTW.

Canon has used losslessly compressed RAW forever, or at least since my...