pseudobreccia

pseudobreccia

Lives in United States San Tan Valley, United States
Works as a Geologist
Has a website at http://geologist.xyz
Joined on Apr 10, 2010

Comments

Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Ergo607: What a drag. Are they going to ban cell phones and tablets from checked luggage as well (since they have LiION batteries as well...?)

Who places cell phones and tablets in checked baggage? It doesn't make sense. Have it in your carry on.

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2017 at 14:47 UTC
In reply to:

Fujica: Then let people remover their battery from the battery compartment. I resist to let my camera go into general luggage and have it steal by bagage handling crew.

OneLeggedCat...Why would someone place a cell phone in checked baggage?

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2017 at 14:46 UTC

I plan on selling my Fujifilm X-Pro2 to purchase this gem...I can't wait! :)

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2017 at 12:38 UTC as 64th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

dharmagreg: This may sound silly, but does taking sunset/sunrise shots, could this cause damage to your lens or camera?

You can't be serious!

Link | Posted on Sep 2, 2017 at 01:23 UTC
In reply to:

Mark Turney: Or ... if you’re a leftist radical, you destroy the photo because he possibly owned slaves or supported slavery by omission of documentation stating he adamantly denounced it.

Don’t read me wrong ... Slavery was and is one of the most vile things ever done to people. Just trying to make an analogy between this very neat piece of history and the statues being knocked down all over the US.

It's always interesting to see the ignorant be the first ones to call someone else ignorant.

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2017 at 01:46 UTC
In reply to:

pseudobreccia: How pathetic! An animal is not a human being, therefore they have no rights in regards to copyright...plain and simple! This is merely another example of lawyers and the legal system running amok!

The guy should of just changed his story...saying that the monkey did not take the photo...that he did via remote...case closed.

Man was created in God's image...animals were not! For all you non-believers out there...a response to this post will be a complete waste of time...for your opinion on this statement is absolutely meaningless to me. You are free to continue your life in ignorance of the truth.

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2017 at 12:52 UTC

How pathetic! An animal is not a human being, therefore they have no rights in regards to copyright...plain and simple! This is merely another example of lawyers and the legal system running amok!

The guy should of just changed his story...saying that the monkey did not take the photo...that he did via remote...case closed.

Link | Posted on Jul 15, 2017 at 13:43 UTC as 108th comment | 7 replies
On article Oberwerth launches Donau line of leather lens pouches (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

BobT3218: It's a German company so I don't have to look at the price to know it is way out of my range. It's strange that products of animal hide still carry an aura of exclusiveness and for just that reason command a considerably higher price.

Leather is the best!

Link | Posted on Mar 25, 2017 at 13:16 UTC
In reply to:

villagranvicent: Those shots look like they were processed by some Lomographic cellphone app. Oh, I am sorry, it's called art.

Ignorance should not be cherished!

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2017 at 12:03 UTC

The punishment should be harsh! First of all, these resources can not be recreated once destroyed. Second...venturing on to the thermal area can be deadly! A harsh punishment should serve as a warning to others!

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2016 at 12:15 UTC as 87th comment
In reply to:

Lou P Dargent: What we need now is a silver X-Pro 2 body to go with the silver lens option.

?

Link | Posted on Aug 26, 2016 at 10:19 UTC

This forum is full of whiners, complainers, and know-it-alls. If they were all removed...who would be left?

The 2x teleconverter by Fuji is a good idea and I'm glad they brought it to market. It's very simple...if you don't like it or don't want it...don't buy it!

Link | Posted on May 22, 2016 at 13:34 UTC as 1st comment

If this lens is such a great idea..they should fund it themselves!

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2016 at 11:47 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply

I've always been a big Pentax fan and supporter...but these sample images are horrible! What the heck is Pentax thinking? I tend to believe that the camera will be really good...but this is no way to market a product and advance the bottom line! A 90-yr old grandma taking a photo for the first time with an iPhone could produce better images than the ones on display!

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2016 at 12:51 UTC as 22nd comment | 7 replies
On article Fujifilm announces X-T1 IR for infrared photography (207 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shiranai: Fuji manager: "Why don't we just leave a filter away and call it a new camera? We could sell it for the same freakin introductory price like our outdated model."
*diabolic laughter*

There is no thin line between making money or taking somebody for a fool...the market determines the price! If they thought profits could be maximized by selling the camera for $4,000, they would do so. Likewise, if they can not sell enough units at the current price to be profitable...they will lower the price in hopes of selling more units and thereby increase profits.

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 17:49 UTC

Taylor Swift doesn't even have to allow pro photographers into her concerts.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 12:15 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on (717 comments in total)
In reply to:

PieterB: I don't see the point of a B/W camera.

Then...I don't see the point of you buying one!

Link | Posted on Jun 12, 2015 at 12:04 UTC
In reply to:

Mister Roboto: While the photo is good, I don't think it is worth that money. Not even close to 1/1000th of the price. It is ridiculous and most likely bogus that someone in the right mind will buy a photo at that price. A worthless homo sapien IMHO.

In regards to the comment by "Mister Roboto"...any object is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 20:55 UTC

a

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 20:54 UTC as 59th comment

Why would anyone want the Leica X when the Fuji X100S is on the market?

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 23:50 UTC as 33rd comment | 5 replies
Total: 30, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »