bernie r

Cheap is a multi billion dollar camera company not insuring their shipping services for your device that requires a repair under warranty or not and forcing you to pay $100's+ in insurance for ...

I don't send it to CPS/Canon due to their disgusting policy of $100 insurance on items, it is absolutely unacceptable. You're sending your items you purchased from Canon, sometimes directly for ...

Why are you so upset? It's just a post, I feel like you may have some unresolved issues.

If you want the best animal eye autofocus, get the R6/5, the A1 doesn't really compete as it seems to struggle with your average Joe birds, only does pets and people, the R5/6 literally does ...

I could honestly see myself hitting that release button by mistake, the camera is quite small and it is in an odd place.

That's nowhere near as good or advanced as Canon's autofocus system...

I wouldn't even bother watching it if I were you, he uses a $600 lens on the R5 and compares it to a Sony $13000 lens as some sort of comparison. Nice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwNRND2qVZU&t ...

Got any other pictures with your $11,000 lens?

'Fine tuning'..? It's a mirrorless camera, this isn't a DSLR. What... They're pulling your leg, get a replacement lens.

Did you test it on an R5 because there's definitely a difference...

RF 15-35 > EF 16-36, RF 24/28-70 > EF 24/28-70, RF 70-200 > EF 70-200, RF 85 > EF 85 all better in image quality, stabilization and AF, you get the picture here right?

That's cool but none of your EF lenses can compete with the RF equivalent. :)

Who cares that its 8K if it's not even 12 bit? Like come on.

Just going to say that I have never had issues using my R5 with a 500/600mm(had a 600mm prior), I always have IS on aswell, the issue either lays with the user or the camera/lens you're using is ...

Not sure, Is this sharp enough?

Well I disagree with that list...

If it's truly 1DX class then it's a no brainer to buy the 1DX R1 over the R5 for professional sport and wildlife...

Because he has no concept of money saving or any sort of reality check in how fricking easy it is to move an adaptor to another lens.

Specs mean nothing if the bottlenecking for the frame rate is correct.

The bigger picture? It's £2300 MORE expensive than the R5, it's an utter joke.