|
sjstremb
Lives in
St Louis, USA, MO, United States
Works as a
Professor of art/photography
Has a website at
http://faculty.samfox.wustl.edu/strembicki/
Joined on
Dec 14, 2001
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |
| 2014_1211_140657AA by old shutter bugger from The Bride | Overloaded by NZ Scott from Your City - Delivery Boy | Barley by Will B Milner from Alone | APPLE & ROACH by TX Photo Doc from Delicious - Unpalatable |
Beginner's GuidesGetting Started
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
real world performanceField Test Videos
see how we seeSample Galleries
In-depth ReviewFujifilm X100F
Show CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017
Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days Past
What's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise
2464FeatureWhat is equivalence?
Nikon FM or FE and there are lots of very nice F3's out there that are priced well especially the non-HP version. Oddly enough, the F4's are surprisingly cheap but are a lot of camera to tote around.
I own a Nikon F, F2, F3, F5 and my go to film camera is still the F2, even in the studio.
I've used this lens as a street photography lens at Mardi Gras, in close quarters its a great lens. I also have a 14-24 and the lighter weight of the 20mm is often a deciding factor. I had a chance to test drive a Zeiss 21mm Milvus last year at MG and the difference between the IQ for me was not worth the loss of the AF.
I found this nugget from the Epson Minister of Propaganda an interesting/amusing bit: “The SureColor P5000 is a replacement to the last Epson Stylus® Pro model still available – the renowned Epson Stylus Pro 4900." Renowned for clogging-head failure, exactly what was it renowned for.... and I say that as an owner of a 4900.
sjstremb: I have a Mk III version of this camera and although it's not the same camera its pretty similar. For me, its a great little party camera, but for any kind of really serious work I actually found the zoom lens lacking. For the $ I did n to think you get the value out of it and I did not think its the kind of camera-for the work I do-to replace either my Xpro 2 or my D810. It is a very nice sensor, but thats the most I can say for it, oh yes, in the first year I had my MK III it spent more time in warranty repair than in my hands, a word of warning to anyone considering one of these little wonders, if it breaks, heaven help you, Sony warrant repair is terrible.
of course, but the point I was making was more that I overestimated the quality of the lens design, perhaps unrealistically I thought this camera would be something that I could use to more something more than snapshots. It was in the end an unrealistic expectation in my goal to user lighter more compact gear. I just did not want anyone else to follow that assumption that I did.
I have a Mk III version of this camera and although it's not the same camera its pretty similar. For me, its a great little party camera, but for any kind of really serious work I actually found the zoom lens lacking. For the $ I did n to think you get the value out of it and I did not think its the kind of camera-for the work I do-to replace either my Xpro 2 or my D810. It is a very nice sensor, but thats the most I can say for it, oh yes, in the first year I had my MK III it spent more time in warranty repair than in my hands, a word of warning to anyone considering one of these little wonders, if it breaks, heaven help you, Sony warrant repair is terrible.
Not any mention of print head design or changes to print head life span. The Epson print head failure rate is a well documented weakness of 4900-9900 printers to the extent that there has been some attempts at a class action lawsuit. Just do a search here about it, it's really criminal.
I hope this new series is not more of the same.