CarpentersEye

The difference between wisdom and folly depends on whether you call that too little for the lens or too much for the body.

Eye tracking and better hardware is a great feature; but there are many more comprehensive parts including the cons.

Also; for non-eye tracking the good "old fashioned" DSLR does AF better.

Once...

Nay. With all the fight Sony brings it's still a half-done system. And they are over-changing for a software update. Missing combined IBIS. And the idea of affordability (because they are not a...

On #9, the D5600: You mean you'd be using the at eye OVF; not any at eye EVF instead of the LCD for stills speed.

No. For landscaping.; when varying from your ideal focal length then either you need less tele or conversely a different and more crop sensor body instead. Assuming you can't just move closer and...

Closer is better. :P

Yeah why did Nikon ever have DX? Silly rabbit.

Why does Fuji have an APSC system; that keeps improving it's benefits balance? In some ways; at least.

Bunch of memos swapped there; I'm sure. Did...

Indeed.

See there's always the exiting new point and it hides the total lack of balanced benefits. Why? Because the makers do not really want to make better camera systems. They are happy stringing first...

Of course by "different" I mean a system you decide you rather own and If so. With a hard case for staying where you are at; unless warranted indeed.

If we didn't work with physics and around what folks said can not be done then we wouldn't have any cameras at all or many other things. Certainly not "mirror-less" EVF etc...

They said you can't...

Looks like that will be a cell cam soon. LOL.

Good point. Excellent point. What's the point; is the point. Because DSLR or mirror-less(DSLE) then what's it for? How is it better for photography and including how much does the total system...

No LOL. With the speed of cell cam progression in design; it has become relevant for everyone. Good job DPR. Though I understand cell cam have a long way to go; to date. Apparently a short time to...

Yeah Brian; but since you know what your doing and what matters then almost everything you just said can also be done with a used body of about $300! Opps.

Yes but folks with OVF still have advantages. Why?

Buying what you have lenses for is bad advice; following bad advice.

Consider the entire system. Sell the system; if it's different. If you paid too much for lenses then why wasn't that...

Yes and you didn't say "can" do better. Because they can and could have. Especially when looking at the very much faster cell cam developments.

I'm not buying this "give them a break' first out...

Down the drain?

No because of size limits and lack of room to LOWER costs per total system benefits value.

Nothing wrong with FF otherwise; It's just more toward specialty.

And FF could and should be much...