Jean Daniel Villiers

You should do a poll about why people should have paid 1500 USD more for the Z8!!! I am sure you will be surprised and my guess why not go Sony, they do smaller bodies their. And then you can go ...

You mean all these sport and action photographer in history luging D3 to Z9 camera bodies where using them only in studios. LOL

Sometimes people get so dumb to feel they are always right, So for you it would have been better if Nikon made the Z8 5500 USD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You might have the money, but many don't, and the z8 ...

LOL, you do look dumb, when people have to pay 150 USD for custom grid line in Sony cameras. Ask the Sony and Canon user how much firmware update did the get, to look less to be polite ...

The other day I saw an online review, and their was sample of the Sony Tamron 70-180 and Nikon one, and the Nikon one has much better corner sharpness. My guess is that the Nikon version is not a ...

LOL, Sony has been historically what Apple was before. The Company DNA is charge for every little change and say to the world it is revolutionary. They just needed to get market share at the start,...

LOL, Sony was the original Apple, always overcharging for every little steps and calling it revolutionary. Only the gullible thought that it was not because they just wanted to get market share...

We are already at Nikon z9 III, with the amout of firmware upgrade we got. LOL

The zf already has a much better AF, which is already a very good sign for a future z6iii and Z5ii camera. I don't know if the xspeed7 will migrate to APSC, but at a certain time it should. Nikon ...

Even those 200-500 difference is a lot for many people. The popularity of cameras like this is simple. What would you prefer to have if you an amateur or starter taking photos, a boring common ...

I think it is about the size and weight (transportability). When you have something that small and lightweight you have no problem carrying it everywhere. You also can go anywhere without drawing ...

While I personally think that the A9iii is far from that revolution with its GS sensor and 120 fps burst (should be called burst) 24 megapixel full raw image, some of those salesmen (influencers) ...

He did say he received the info before the unveiling of the a9. For now it looks very vague, but he has been very precise most of the time, but only he, knows if the person who told him this is ...

No one need 8k. As someone who does much more videos right now, I would prefer a 5 to 6k sensor for 4k delivery. So a 20-24 megapixel is ample enough.

LOL. people just drink the marketing as if it before this sensor it was impossible to do sport photography. Some people were asking if the athletes foot would have been bent if it was not for the ...

The 120 fps is very nice, but it is only for one second, it then drops. Second disadvantage is that when the buffer is full, it takes like 40 second to clear.

I saw someone asking about how would the legs of athletes in one of the preview online be. I mean, how dumb some people are drinking marketing coolaid. What he meant is if their legs would have ...

LOL, you think they would be bent, so all these years before that camera, the athletes foot were bent lol.

Golbal shutter, even more so in photo, is so much overhype. I mean for video, with the older sensor rolling shutter was a problem, A little less now, but for photo, someone is asking how the leg of...

After all the hype, so geek will be in admiration that the blades of a helicopter or plane are how they should be. Because beyond the hype, what photos did people not be able to take that this...