emax

Jumbo shrimp.

Viva Polaroid!

Not bad.

Just use free nose reduction software, like SchnozShrinker or Proboscissors.

I thought it was June 30, 1852.

Actually, the K-1 has 50% more resolution, and 125% more pixels than the D4.

Excellent reply, Roger.  I like your eerie photo.  Hopefully Edmonton and the rest of western Canada wll get some relief from the smoke and fires before too long. Now, I think it's time this thread ...

...while I kiss the sky! (I hope you didn't:  that would be like kissing a smoker.) Were you Blinded by the Light?

Okay, sunjester, please show us a graph that starts at the Equivalent Aperture of f/0.

Phone with a mirror = Selfphone

Nice job. Looking forward to some shots of Peggy's Cove, assuming it's on your itinerary.

No they don't.

That test shot of Zürich looks sharper than the test shots I took with the 70-300 P FX VR on a D7100 at 300m, f/5.6.  The sample I tested might have been poor, and / or AF fine-tune might have had ...

I travel with a D7100.  For the past few years, I used the 70-200 f/4 VR as my main travel telezoom, but recently I replaced it with the much smaller, lighter and cheaper 70-300 P DX VR. The new ...

No, but that's okay, because the lens has TTL capability (toilet-to-lips).

GG / VW Giorgetto tried to be gorgeous here:  his hair was robust; his suit maybe a bit too tight. Though his VW Golf / Rabbit design might not have been gorgeous, at least the scenery was.

I typically take between zero and several dozen, depending on the subject.

Traveling with a single prime would be a NIGHTMARE for me, because I almost always travel with 3 compact zooms that give me a combined focal-length range of 15-450mm (FF equivalent). I suppose a ...

RX100 VB, VC, VD... (maybe skip the latter).

If you were a nudist, you could take selfies of Uranus.