FKS

A bit late, but I don't have that much free time to edit my photos. Another round of action from the beach. Waves were smaller than the last time. Nikon Z7 + 200-500mm VR

Highly doubtful. They're not going to go down the Canon nomenclature path.

I've experienced this every so often with the 1 Series bodies and the Z7, usually when walking around and the camera is pointed down, then I bring it up to eye level to take a photo. I chalked it ...

IBVR would be more appropriate since IS is associated with Canon :)

I had the 50-500mm (non-VR version), and the 200-500mm has noticeably better IQ. AF speed is about the same though (never did a head-to-head). The Sigma is great for when you need to zoom out (eg ...

We will probably not see a third party lens that takes advantage of the larger diameter of the Z mount as that would mean it couldn't be used on other camera brands. From that POV, Nikon lenses ...

Thank you for the compliments :)

With the restriction on sitting on the beach lifted, it's time to take the Z7+ 200-500mm out for some surfing shots. I'm also starting to get the hang of subject tracking. The waves can confuse it ...

I've been using hand sanitizer for over ten years now on the recommendation of my dermatologist (due to a combination of eczema and OCD). I haven't noticed any ill effects on any of my camera ...

You must be as steady as Hasa :) My hands aren't that stable, and VR is a big help with both framing and reducing the effects of image shake. I wouldn't be able to get good shots hand holding my ...

Enjoyed your photos. I struggle with getting close enough at 28mm, not sure that I can deal with 14mm, but your photos have given me ideas.

I use my 100mm f/2 and other Contax lenses on a Z7. Focusing is a breeze with the EVF magnification feature (much more accurate than relying on focus highlighting). CA is more visible with all ...

If you have a 100mm f/2, that's not a macro lens, which is why the minimum focus distance isn't that close. The 100mm macro is an f/2.8 lens.

Just to clarify, both the 300mm PF and the 70-200mm f/4 are designed for FX sensors (Nikon's terminology for a 35mm-sized sensor). fferreres wrote:

OT, did you try this lens with the FTZ? I had a copy of this lens that behaved like this, the VR wouldn't work with a D5200, but it worked on a V1 + FT1. I don't have that lens anymore, but I'm ...

Why would you want Nikon to spend time and money on developing this feature? Would you actually use it? Don't you have a phone or laptop from the last 20 years or so?

I do find having the focus and zoom rings swapped takes a little getting used to, especially after years of using a 70-200VR. But the IQ is impressive, even with the TC-14E. AF is also noticeably ...

I would get results like this with my Fuji X-E1 and X-E2 set to the Velvia film simulation. Haven't seen it with the Z7 though.

Good point. So we may never get CFExpress compatibility with all current (let alone future) cards.

There's only one Z DX body, and it's only been out five months or so. You're throwing in the towel a bit early, I would think.