Leitz

Narrow minded useless comment.

Sony professional video equipment was 100%, that's for sure.

The production model will be limited to 10 fps for faster selection of the right shot, In photojournalism, speed is paramount. Why waste time searching through thousands of frames....

Thanks for your explaination TRU, I THOUGHT it was clear I was having a bit of fun :)

"Period. End of discussion"

You make a fool of yourself, take a break.

The "Pros" BS again, laughable!

Exactly, as long as the camera can't read my mind everything "auto" is useless to me.

One more please?

Dials and buttons are faster than ANY menu. Nothing wrong with Sony menus BTW.

Most users buy it for the red dot and bragging rights.

The best sold cameras are cheap cameras and therefore have limited controls. They do not sell better for having less buttons, but because they are cheap.

Agreed, Minolta 7D had a great user interface.

There are many other cases where you need to control the triangle shutter speed, aperture and iso value for optimal or even decent results.

Camera's have no brain, better use your own....

IOS? I dont want to depend on the Apple store, itunes etc. Customisation also comes to mind, for a camera.

Whatever.....

Lying again, even my A6500 and Nex-7 can magnify the picture in the viewfinder. The rear screen is small compared to the view in the viewfinder, pick up a A1 and see for your self. Now please stop...

In the OLED viewfinder you can see the real quality and sharpness of your shots, far better than on any rear LCD.

Leica rebranding lenses is nothing new, in the seventies and eighties many Minolta designed lenses and camera's were sold as Leica for premium prices.

Look for the posting by Mir on the bottom...

With a 9.44 million-dot OLED viewfinder I couldn't care less about the resolution of the back screen.
LCD sucks anyway compared to OLED regardless resolution.

You are lying again, from the review pro list:

"Excellent menus and responsive touchscreen interface"