lawamainn

lawamainn

Lives in Norway Trondheim, Norway
Joined on May 30, 2010

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On article Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)

It looks more like a Pentax 6x7, than the Pentax LX, Pentax` 35mm pro camera during the late 80`s. And that`s great!! I Use Canon (work) and Sony (hobby) myself, but hey, welcome to the Full Frame Club Pentax! Impressive specs and features, I think it will do well!! :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 19:33 UTC as 497th comment
On article Pentax K-1 Review (2663 comments in total)
In reply to:

Absolutic: I want Pentax to succeed.

Me too, even as a Sony user! ;-)

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2016 at 07:03 UTC

Impressive that 5 people claim they have the camera, even more so the 22 who has had it, when it`s expected to be in store in March.... It seems very impressive though!!!

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2016 at 13:56 UTC as 24th comment

This roundup is bad news for Pentax 645.... Guess they have to do something, fast!

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2015 at 09:44 UTC as 30th comment | 1 reply
On article Sony Alpha 7R II Review (2165 comments in total)

Gimme some money!!!!! ;-D

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 17:17 UTC as 164th comment
On article Sony SLT-A77 II Review (553 comments in total)

Motion blur??

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 15:50 UTC as 81st comment
On article Fujifilm X100T Review (696 comments in total)

Way too expensive, limited usage (fixed 23mm), low resolution.....Compared to, say, A6000, it seems pretty miserable! Why did Fuji make this camera?

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2015 at 06:53 UTC as 53rd comment | 19 replies

Got the 16mm pancake, with the (chrome) fisheye-converter, and it must be said the combination need to be stopped down to at least f/11 to produce fairly good result. The 16mm is a very handy, and pretty good wide angle in itself, so the converter is a really cheap alternative to have some fisheye-fun!! :-)

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2015 at 11:52 UTC as 7th comment
On article Mid-range Mirrorless camera roundup (2014) (30 comments in total)

When it comes to value for money, this camera is unbeatable! The resolution power alone makes it a winner. And the feature set is pretty awesome as well. I love it!

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 09:01 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On article Mid-range Mirrorless camera roundup (2013) (296 comments in total)

DPreview "don`t like " the lower resolution on the EVF compared with NEX-6. Have you guys ever peeked through these EVF`s and compared??? The A6000`s EVF is much, MUCH better than NEX-6. Brighter, less noisy and, above all, less drag!! They have reduced the resolution, true, but that`s allmost unnoticable in real life use! :-)

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:55 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Will Taylor73: God Leica are tedious! They bring out these hyped-up 2nd rate cameras and the mindless Leica fan-bois come out in droves to clap their hands and congratulate a dying company on it's paltry efforts to make itself relevant. Leica are simply irrelevant to modern photography. When I see someone with a digital Leica I know (from experience and making an effort to chat to these folks) that they are cashed-up pretenders who care far more about the credence the brand 'lends' their photography than just about anything else. Let Leica dye I say.

Ehh... I have 6 comments in total, and one comment regarding Lerica Cameras...
I do not question the quality of Leica at all! If it`s worth the pricetag? Well, not for me, but I can understand why many are. A friend of mine has a M9, and it`s fantastic piece of engineering! But do I want it? No, because it doesn`t fit my type of photography-

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2014 at 08:33 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Benedetto Photo: The construction quality of this camera is impressive. However, the image quality is about the same as my Ricoh GR, which costs thousands less.

You can`t change, it comes with a fixed 18,3 mm F/2,8.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 07:20 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

Will Taylor73: God Leica are tedious! They bring out these hyped-up 2nd rate cameras and the mindless Leica fan-bois come out in droves to clap their hands and congratulate a dying company on it's paltry efforts to make itself relevant. Leica are simply irrelevant to modern photography. When I see someone with a digital Leica I know (from experience and making an effort to chat to these folks) that they are cashed-up pretenders who care far more about the credence the brand 'lends' their photography than just about anything else. Let Leica dye I say.

I agree with you to a certain extent, but Leica is NOT a "soon-to-be-extinct"-company, in fact, they can hardly cope with the demand, and have excellent economic figures....! And the technical/mecanical quality is excellent, of course.
When that is said, I was seeing through a Leica Facebook Group, and it was a sad experience, rubbish from the first to the last picture, with some exceptions of course. And it seemed that the members thought that adding "summilux bla bla", "distagon bla bla" etc with the caption should elevate the the quality of their "work"....

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 07:13 UTC
On article Sony a6000 Review (908 comments in total)

Can`t wait to buy this camera!!!

Link | Posted on Jun 7, 2014 at 19:28 UTC as 131st comment
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14