Dryce

I can't recall SA lenses or Sigma's own flash shoe variant of their flashes being widely available - ever - even back in the days of their film SLRs. Online shops either don't list them or put ...

Shoot raw. Save as AdobeRGB Tiff.

I haven't used the Q enough to really get a feel for it. In particular I haven't printed much from a DPQ. However my observation so far is that with a DP0Q vs a DP1M the DP0Q images 'compete' with ...

I think it's the field curvature that is at the core of most of this. The impact varies on how you use it - subject, style, and the settings you use. In some cases it may 'improve' the apparent ...

If going the MFT route then unles you go for the 'pro' F1,2 primes and F2.8 zooms the cheaper lenses are generally neat and small. You can carry a really small kit with something like the ...

As Xpatusa states - Merrill is 15Mp so you have three layers each 15Mp. It's about the equivalent IMO of 30Mp in the real world. More importantly the lenses in the DP cameras are well matched to ...

Conversely it could be argued that the Foveon top layer gets more photons because it gets them all - as opposed to the bayer sensors which effectively filter each pixel to block photons. Maybe what ...

I would say Merrills are morre about detail and texture than colour. The problem with Merrills is the dynamic range works a bit differently from the likes of the Sony sensors. So you find that ...

I've used 3rd party batteries since acquiring my first digital camera in 2001. The only issue I have had is with an 'updated' Sony charger refusing to recognise a third party battery. And older ...

Yes it's different. It looks striking. And the camera body feels like a substantial quality product. (The LCD on the rear is a big improvement over the DPMs). But I think it's a mistake - the grip ...

The Pentax K-01 won a German design awards. These 'awards' are not meaningful in the real world.

DP0Q also has a rather large lens. I have to say thought that having now had the opportunity to spend some time with a DPQ that IMO the shape and layout of the grip that they have chosen isn't a ...

I'm not so sure about this. The DP cameras are sold primarily on the sensors being different - leaving the contribution of the lenses overlooked. Sigma might actually be no worse off in terms of ...

Sony sort of did. There was the QX1, Qx10, and QX100. I'm guessing they were not very successful. My recollection is that they cost at least as much as an equivalent camera with an equivalent ...

IMO the X100F isn't something that would complement a Pen-F if you already have a 17mm or 20mm prime - which you do. I don't think the X100F - even though it's an undeniably nice bit of kit -  ...

It's not much of a commitment (IMO). Very minimal. Half hearted even. If there was a committed strategy then by now we would have seen some more significant offerings. Tamron haven't exactly ...

It's not a strategy they implemented so far. Sigma have made very few of these lenses and their commitment has tended to be towards the physically larger and heavier mounts. If Sigma wanted to ...

The problem for a lens manufacturer and MFT is that those lenses that Panasonic and Olympus are making are not quite the same as APS-C / FF compatible. So to compete in that market Sigma would have ...

The Godox is a neat package in terms of not being physically too large and it supports HSS and has both wireless transmit and receive - and it's priced reasonably. It's a good size match for the ...

The Dell 2716D is another possible option. No hood. It supports use of a Colormunki iDisplay Pro for calibration.