RDM5546

Part of my decision to cancel my RF 200-800 included consderation for the fact that I have both R5 and R7 bodies along with the RF800f11 and both 1.4x & 2X TCs to complement my RF 100-400 and RF ...

Even more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWCwBKsR0uo

More comparisons https://www.canon-europe.com/lenses/rf-200-800mm-f6-3-9-is-usm/ https://s7d1.scene7.com/is/content/canon/RF200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM_Spec-Sheetpdf https://www.canon.com.cy/pro/storie ...

https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens.aspx Why is the Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM not an L-series lens? To be considered an L-series lens, all ...

One more factor to consider is the RF 200-800 may have fewer optical coatings.   At least they are not listed in the material I have seen.  The coatings Canon puts on are very nice will reduce ...

I agree. I will stick with the RF 100-500 along with the RF100-400. I now have cancelled my RF 200-800 at B&H Photo. For what I shoot mostly I just do not need it and it weighs 1 lb more. For many ...

It sounds like a good solution for your situation. That is a good thing. I am now wondering if already own a RF100-500 what do you really gain with this new lens. The 100-800 has fewer optical ...

Looking at those MTFs the 200-800 is definitely no slouch vs the 100-500!!   I was surprised by how well the 200-800 did while being $1000 cheaper than the 100-500. I own the 100-500 and I have ...

Thank you for the MTF reference. I liked looking at it https://www.canonrumors.com/a-look-at-the-canon-rf-200-800mm-f-6-3-9-is-usm-mtf/

Thank you for posting this link.   I have watched all of new 200-800 content but I somehow missed this one.  He shows great images but does document the FL they were shot at.  I have heard ...

Every lens has it's compromise.   I have the Sigma 16-600 C which weighs the same as this RF 200-800.   I use it some but the weight is a concern.   I have Canon RF 800f11 prime, RF 100-400 and ...

Twenty years ago if you bought many Canon primes they were just soft wide open. They had "character". The L glass was better but far from perfect. Canon just kepting working on them and now all ...

You need two R5s.  One with the 24-70f2.8 and the other with the 70-200f2.8

RF to M adapter can not be made.

The RF 200-800 was built to compete with the Nikon and Sony 150-600mm models which sell for $1999.  Everything was done to get the price  and weight down to achieve this.  No "L" weather sealing, ...

A waste of money. Buy a lens instead.

I have RF 15-35f2.8, RF 24-70f2.8, and RF 70-200f2.8.  People have worried about dust getting to some of these lenses.   Has anyone had an actual dust problem?   My lenses seem clean after a ...

There already is an FF F1.2 50mm

I heard the rumor that there was a FF 50mm f1.4 prime among the ten next year. Of course just a rumor.

Buying the #1 market seller means more money for Canon to develop new technology.  However getting the #1 selling product vs the #3 selling product is not so important if the camera does what you ...